AcidicDreams
10+ year member
I don't need one of these
that seems like good logic... however we'd need to source the e85 and the financial benefit of the hybrids would go mostly to the conventional gasoline cars who would enjoy the same lower prices but not be stuck with the added maintnence cost of the hybrid drivetrain... also that avg tax I believe is only the federal tax but I may be wrongto the guy commenting on .05-.08 in tax law's if they were taken away, acidic is more on the right level it's avg. around .38 per gallon i think. on the e85 theory, won't ever happen in a HUGE result. the best way to get oil price's to either become stable again or drop is a even or more so even divide. i just finished my econ class today and got a good grade on my final so i'm happy but my teacher liked my theory.
say the US just the US for example have 300 million people, figure 40% drive (just a guess) so that means in the US there are 140 million cars, give or take. Now, lets say of consumer driver's 75% are regular gas engine cars, 18% are hybrid, and the remaining 7% are e85. If you simply reduce all gas engine cars to e85 we as a country would have to have 10 times the acerage of corn we have now so that's not really realistic(that's a real # not my theory lol). now let's say in theory you take that 75% of gas engine cars down to even say 45% reducing it by 30%, thein increase your e85 by say 12% taking it to 19% e85, and then 36% hybrid. You'd not only maintain a solid petrolium source for 2 to 3 times longer but, on imagine the cost change in gas prices. Suply might not change but with that many more fuel efficient/alternate fuel source vehicle's, you'd reduce cost of gas enough to enjoy life more.
sorry if that's hard to read, it's 2am and i'm tired lol.
oh on gas price's, filled up today at 2.39 a gallon i feel special.
I'm paying 3.09/gallon here
ohh and econmically smart guys with hot plus size women FTW!
