We seem to disagree on almost everything.Originally posted by Wonderbread with a lack of skill???
what? Pippen has no skill... neither does Kukoch, or Rodman... Kerr couldn;t shoot worth a crap...
imagine if Kobe didn't have to give the ball up half the time to the big man... lets see... 13 games... 553 points? something like that... not bad, eh?
Jordan never did that... find Kobe a swingman like Pippen and watch the numbers grow...
Dennis Rodman in his prime was easily the best rebounder in the game... Jordan hardly ever got only one chance... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif "Mike, would you like to shoot again? Here you go!"
cmon now... taht's my frist problem with that statement.. secondly... good luck finding a second jordan... the world is too preoccuipied with finding the next jordan... what about the first Kobe? why must everyone bve compared to Jordan? he was a very very good player, he revitalized the NBA, brought it back from the verge of brankruptcy... but cmon now... there are players who are as good, if not better than Jordan...
No one has done what Jordan has done and that's why everyone talks about finding the next Jordan. I also remember Pippen suffering with back problems in the playoffs. Jordan also put up 40 points in a game with the flu to lead his team to victory. There was no center as dominant as Shaq, but the bulls could have picked practically any center in the league and that center would have been better than longley. This also shows what an advantage Kobe has over Jordan. Kobe doesn't ****, but I think TMAC is a better player. If it came down to TMAC vs. Kobe, I'd take TMAC.Originally posted by Wonderbread the point youa re failing ot realize is that todays game is vastly different...
in those days, Jordan was a pioneer.. today, anyone can do that stuff...
in his day, the big man was NOT a dominant factor...
in his day, Pippen, and Ro**** were in their primes, not riding the coattailsof their fading careers... Rodman, when he was on teh bulls, was easily the best rebounder in teh league... i dare you to say that jordan inflated his rebounding stats taht won him the league leadership in taht cat....
you stole that you ratbastard, lol I found it firstOriginally posted by ss3079![]()
- Steve
If we get into 1 on 1, I'd probably go with A.I....Originally posted by joshpoints If it came down to TMAC vs. Kobe, I'd take TMAC.
He isn't going anywhere, well at least he ain't goin anywhere with that team, they are a bunch of lazy bastards....Originally posted by denim i wish jordan was not going anywhere
hey Dixon is playing his butt off, and is doing really good for a rookie that is his sizeOriginally posted by snova031 He isn't going anywhere, well at least he ain't goin anywhere with that team, they are a bunch of lazy bastards....
I also think Iverson is a great player, especially for his size and he is always getting hit and playing with broken bones. He is one of my favorite players. But I have to disagree with you on Larry Hughes. Iverson would toast him in a one on one game.Originally posted by snova031 If we get into 1 on 1, I'd probably go with A.I....
Or maybe Larry Hughes, better crossover than Iverson...
Dixon has skills. Most of the teams that they play up against they have a chance of beating, but when it comes down to the end of the game they lose. Usually it's pretty close at the end and then they make a mistake. Dixon will be a good player in the NBA.Originally posted by denim hey Dixon is playing his butt off, and is doing really good for a rookie that is his size