THE Thread

man ya'll sound like a buch of lil boys that just left tha local ***** all gettin laid

so whats better now nknowing we're gettin mods or ***

hell i'd reather have ***! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif :p //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif

 
too bad this forum isnt like SD's chat room editor....

say "f a g" and it posts "homosexual"

say "d i c k" and it post "shclong"

say....lol //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Originally posted by Wonderbread with a lack of skill???

what? Pippen has no skill... neither does Kukoch, or Rodman... Kerr couldn;t shoot worth a crap...

imagine if Kobe didn't have to give the ball up half the time to the big man... lets see... 13 games... 553 points? something like that... not bad, eh?

Jordan never did that... find Kobe a swingman like Pippen and watch the numbers grow...

Dennis Rodman in his prime was easily the best rebounder in the game... Jordan hardly ever got only one chance... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif "Mike, would you like to shoot again? Here you go!"

cmon now... taht's my frist problem with that statement.. secondly... good luck finding a second jordan... the world is too preoccuipied with finding the next jordan... what about the first Kobe? why must everyone bve compared to Jordan? he was a very very good player, he revitalized the NBA, brought it back from the verge of brankruptcy... but cmon now... there are players who are as good, if not better than Jordan...
We seem to disagree on almost everything.

First off Jordan made these guys good. He's able to keep guys together. Remember how LA tried to put rodman on their team and they just couldn't deal with him. Let's be honest The amount of skill that is on LA is equal to what the Bulls had, except LA has the most dominant player down low. Look at how many games Horry has won for them. Then they got that short guy that shoots three's. Points don't tell how good someone is. What really matters is if their team is actually winning. I guarantee you that the Lakers would not have won any of those championships without Shaq. You could have had other players in place of KObe though. If Kobe doesn't get the ball to Shaq enough the Lakers will lose. SHaq is a huge factor. He causes everyone on the other team to foul out, along with his ability to score against any defender. If Kobe scores 44 points in each playoff game and Shaq has 12 points in each game they will not win the playoff's.

THat's all I'll say for now.

 
the point youa re failing ot realize is that todays game is vastly different...

in those days, Jordan was a pioneer.. today, anyone can do that stuff...

in his day, the big man was NOT a dominant factor...

in his day, Pippen, and Ro**** were in their primes, not riding the coattailsof their fading careers... Rodman, when he was on teh bulls, was easily the best rebounder in teh league... i dare you to say that jordan inflated his rebounding stats taht won him the league leadership in taht cat....

 
Originally posted by Wonderbread the point youa re failing ot realize is that todays game is vastly different...

in those days, Jordan was a pioneer.. today, anyone can do that stuff...

in his day, the big man was NOT a dominant factor...

in his day, Pippen, and Ro**** were in their primes, not riding the coattailsof their fading careers... Rodman, when he was on teh bulls, was easily the best rebounder in teh league... i dare you to say that jordan inflated his rebounding stats taht won him the league leadership in taht cat....
No one has done what Jordan has done and that's why everyone talks about finding the next Jordan. I also remember Pippen suffering with back problems in the playoffs. Jordan also put up 40 points in a game with the flu to lead his team to victory. There was no center as dominant as Shaq, but the bulls could have picked practically any center in the league and that center would have been better than longley. This also shows what an advantage Kobe has over Jordan. Kobe doesn't ****, but I think TMAC is a better player. If it came down to TMAC vs. Kobe, I'd take TMAC.

 
8320.gif


- Steve

 
Originally posted by snova031 If we get into 1 on 1, I'd probably go with A.I....

 

Or maybe Larry Hughes, better crossover than Iverson...
I also think Iverson is a great player, especially for his size and he is always getting hit and playing with broken bones. He is one of my favorite players. But I have to disagree with you on Larry Hughes. Iverson would toast him in a one on one game.

 
Originally posted by denim hey Dixon is playing his butt off, and is doing really good for a rookie that is his size
Dixon has skills. Most of the teams that they play up against they have a chance of beating, but when it comes down to the end of the game they lose. Usually it's pretty close at the end and then they make a mistake. Dixon will be a good player in the NBA.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

RangerMan

Premium Member
Premium Member
Thread starter
RangerMan
Joined
Location
NC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
182,982
Views
3,256,463
Last reply date
Last reply from
x2o
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top