**The MLB Thread**

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Prove it Timmy.
he is better in every category. What else needs to be proven.

Would you like me to call up peter gammons and get his opinion so will shut the hell up? I'll even ask to talk to krukie, i'm sure he will want to hit you over the head with a baseball bat to to knock some common sense in to that small brain of yours.

 
he is better in every category. What else needs to be proven.
Would you like me to call up peter gammons and get his opinion so will shut the hell up? I'll even ask to talk to krukie, i'm sure he will want to hit you over the head with a baseball bat to to knock some common sense in to that small brain of yours.
He is only marginally better. The difference are negligible when talking about an entire career. if Jeter is top 20, then Larkin is top 50.

 
If Larkin would've had 169 more singles, he would have a 316 career batting average, 392 OBP, 465 slugging percentage, 857 OPS, 441 doubles, and 76 triples which would all be higher then Jeter's numbers. He would trail Jeter by 26 hits 2509 to 2535 and by 8 home runs 206 to 198. That is assuming all of Larkin's extra 169 hits are singles. You are in essence saying that Larkin was only 169 singles away from being one of the greatest of all time.

 
If Larkin would've had 169 more singles, he would have a 316 career batting average, 392 OBP, 465 slugging percentage, 857 OPS, 441 doubles, and 76 triples which would all be higher then Jeter's numbers. He would trail Jeter by 26 hits 2509 to 2535 and by 8 home runs 206 to 198. That is assuming all of Larkin's extra 169 hits are singles. You are in essence saying that Larkin was only 169 singles away from being one of the greatest of all time.
now go see what jeters average would be at if he had 169 more singles. i will be waiting.

 
The point is, the difference between Jeter and Larkin is 169 singles over a 14 year career. That is a little over 10 singles a season.
don't matter. Some times it takes major leagers over a week or maybe two to get 10 hits. The seasons weren't waiting for larkin to get them hits.

 
don't matter. Some times it takes major leagers over a week or maybe two to get 10 hits. The seasons weren't waiting for larkin to get them hits.
**** Larkin only needed 169 singles to be an all time great. Poor guy. If only the kid could've stayed healthy.

 
Jesus Shaun, you get so upset over shit and just always have to prove a point. It's no wonder you don't have any friends in real life and a mut for a gf who hasssss to be fawking retarded to be with you.

Just STFU ace!

Cleveland gets Mark DeRosa from the Cubbies.........good solid infielder and can hit to boot. Nice addition for Cleveland. I imagine he will play 3rd and gives them a lot of depth in changing up the line-up on certain nights. Awesome deal!

Now we need one decent starter and it will be a good off-season for Cleveland.

 
Angels signed Fuentes

Mets close to Lowe

Larkin > Jeter //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slammed

5,000+ posts
Striking Accord
Thread starter
Slammed
Joined
Location
Gotham City, NY
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
10,961
Views
144,621
Last reply date
Last reply from
hornedfrog1985
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top