Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lugnutz" data-source="post: 5425891" data-attributes="member: 603567"><p>If Larkin would've had 169 more singles, he would have a 316 career batting average, 392 OBP, 465 slugging percentage, 857 OPS, 441 doubles, and 76 triples which would all be higher then Jeter's numbers. He would trail Jeter by 26 hits 2509 to 2535 and by 8 home runs 206 to 198. That is assuming all of Larkin's extra 169 hits are singles. You are in essence saying that Larkin was only 169 singles away from being one of the greatest of all time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lugnutz, post: 5425891, member: 603567"] If Larkin would've had 169 more singles, he would have a 316 career batting average, 392 OBP, 465 slugging percentage, 857 OPS, 441 doubles, and 76 triples which would all be higher then Jeter's numbers. He would trail Jeter by 26 hits 2509 to 2535 and by 8 home runs 206 to 198. That is assuming all of Larkin's extra 169 hits are singles. You are in essence saying that Larkin was only 169 singles away from being one of the greatest of all time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
**The MLB Thread**
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list