Are you really going to take the position that any of us can reasonably be expected to ascertain the significance of that "picture" simply by looking at it? If you had not read someone else's interpertation of that calendar would you be able to ascertain it's meaning?To all of you close minded ones, how do you look at this picture and not see the significance of it? This calendar was real, it is made up of real data from there time. This was there scientific way of predicting what happened in the past and would happen in the future. They were great at predicting things and have proven that they knew what they were doing, so why do the closed minded ones not see the significance of the 4 squares and cirlcle god in the middle?
![]()
what exactly are you trying to say? Do you not understand it? Just asking.Are you really going to take the position that any of us can reasonably be expected to ascertain the significance of that "picture" simply by looking at it? If you had not read someone else's interpertation of that calendar would you be able to ascertain it's meaning?
Oh, I am absolutely saying that I can't tell shit just by looking at it. In fact, unless someone told me I would not have even known it was a calendar. I might have guessed that it was, but it would have been just that, a fairly reasonable guess.what exactly are you trying to say? Do you not understand it? Just asking.
please watch this videoTheirs no way anyone could look at that without prior knowledge and say "Thats a calender, world ends 2012, kthxbai"
scientists decoded that shit just like they decoded all the egyptians writings. Thats all i can say about that part.Oh, I am absolutely saying that I can't tell shit just by looking at it. In fact, unless someone told me I would not have even known it was a calendar. I might have guessed that it was, but it would have been just that, a fairly reasonable guess.
So, if you were the first person to see that in centuries, would you have looked at it and said, "zomg, this says the world is going to end in 2012?"
I just don't see how your conclusion that the world will end at the end of the 5,000 year period logically follows. It could be that they had other shit to do, or they thought that having a calendar that extended into the future many l centuries was enough. What about the belief that you just cycled into a new era?So if they were that good at predicting astronomical events and ended there calendar on a certain date, then there calendar is probably correct that the world will end or change dramatically in 2012 since it is all tied in together with astronomy.