req
5,000+ posts
am a mod.
he said .3 cubes //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Im building the box now. It's going to be about 3 cubes, ported around 55 hertz.
No he didn't???????????????]he said .3 cubes
Might as well not build a box. Thats whats wrong. It would be like cutting a hole in the wall of your house and using the house as an enclosure for a 15".3 cubes is right. whats wrong with having no "back pressure"?
Yikes. Why not just set the speaker inside the box, instead of bothering to cut a hole and mount it? Unless, of course, you plan on using it as a port later. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
The sub will move too much, you'll destroy the suspension before anything else. A smaller box would work better, if you play the sub at the box's tuning frequency it will make the most sound w/ the least movement.3 cubes is right. whats wrong with having no "back pressure"?
If you mount the speaker in an enclosure larger than the VAS of the speaker, it will act as if its playing free-air anyway. This size box has got to be way over that 4" speaker's VAS. Add to that grossly overpowering the speaker by hundreds and thousands of watts, and you might as well just hook it to the wall socket with no box, it will have just about the same results.that defeats the purpose of a ported box
X2 pointless.If you mount the speaker in an enclosure larger than the VAS of the speaker, it will act as if its playing free-air anyway. This size box has got to be way over that 4" speaker's VAS. Add to that grossly overpowering the speaker by hundreds and thousands of watts, and you might as well just hook it to the wall socket with no box, it will have just about the same results.