t20001

[boomzabit 10+ year member]

The RF t20001 is what i call a high quailty amp, i wish i would bought this over my 1501bd even tho the 1501bd is a very nice amp, but i was looking through birsheets and what not on the t20001, and it puts out the same power at both 2 ohm and 1 ohm. Are their any other amps like this, now i know why they charge so much for the t20001

Click to read more...

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Don't know what birthsheet you were looking at, but the RF Power T20001bd does not (should not) put out the same power at both 2ohm and 1ohm. Power is increased when running a 1ohm load with that amp.

 

[cjjackson85 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/needpics.gif.edd6d28e76618c28c46f343991bcced5.gif of your birthsheet...

 

[FOSGATE JOE 10+ year member]

Don't know what birthsheet you were looking at, but the RF Power T20001bd does not (should not) put out the same power at both 2ohm and 1ohm. Power is increased when running a 1ohm load with that amp.

^^x2 i got the 1001bd and at 1 ohm i get full power //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[boomzabit 10+ year member]

http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/10/web/382000-382999/382799_92_full.jpg

Hope that works

 

[FOSGATE JOE 10+ year member]

first time i seen that it doesn't say that in my r.f manuel??where did you get that amp?p.s why is you're efficiency at 69% thats low for rf //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/furious.gif.fc81ca146dbff91fede3ed290dbc4f4c.gif mine is 85% //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

 

[boomzabit 10+ year member]

that amp is not mine, i wish it was but it does same power at both 2 and 1 ohm, little bit more at 2 ohm, your t20001 doesnt do the same thing ?

 

[boomzabit 10+ year member]

i just got word from the owner the amp is rated at 1500w, but as we all see the amp is a bit underrated //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif RF done good with this amps, sorta like a two in one deal

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

That picture has been edited. Of the about 8 T20001's I've seen, that is the first one like that.

Power @ 2 ohms should be around 1800 watts...

 

[boomzabit 10+ year member]

That picture has been edited. Of the about 8 T20001's I've seen, that is the first one like that.
Power @ 2 ohms should be around 1800 watts...

Im not thinking so

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Im not thinking so

Ok fair enough. Your entitled to that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[FOSGATE JOE 10+ year member]

i just got word from the owner the amp is rated at 1500w,

uh no that amp at less should do 2000 watts not 1500watts //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif may be 2500rms but not 1500 go to the web pag at rockfordfosgate.com //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif what year is that amp i think the old rf power stuff where 2 ohm and the new is 1 ohm so you're right my bad //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Yeah, that's either not a T20001, it's been photoshoped, or something is wrong with that amplifier. Efficiency is seriously low (should be in the 75-85% range), and power output should not decrease at 1ohm. It should be substantially higher @ 1ohm.

 

[Nikuk 5,000+ posts]

Yeah, that's either not a T20001, it's been photoshoped, or something is wrong with that amplifier. Efficiency is seriously low (should be in the 75-85% range), and power output should not decrease at 1ohm. It should be substantially higher @ 1ohm.

That is.

I've seen T3 birthsheets swing from 60%-88%. There are a crapton of them on TP.com.

-Nick

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

That is.
I've seen T3 birthsheets swing from 60%-88%.

Seriously? I know I haven't seen as many birthsheets as you have, but I haven't seen any with much below 75%. Christ, I could pick up a class A/B and have quite a bit more than 60% efficiency.