Isn't it basically XBL^2 with more coil surface area?It's been a while since I read that white paper, it's a good explanation of the concept. Better heat dissipation, better control, symmetrical flux, and more design options for electrical and mechanical parameters are the main advantages. Yes, JBL pioneered the technology in the 80's and we owe a lot of speaker technology to JBL and Harmon. If you want to know how it works, look at their research.
Don't worry about what people told you, just read the paper above and it tells all.
The paper also addresses the advantages of using neo magnets, something ignored by the copycats.
The "breaking coil" is why those JBL subs are very difficult to "bottom out".
Thanks! I like neo for many reasonsIt's been a while since I read that white paper, it's a good explanation of the concept. Better heat dissipation, better control, symmetrical flux, and more design options for electrical and mechanical parameters are the main advantages. Yes, JBL pioneered the technology in the 80's and we owe a lot of speaker technology to JBL and Harmon. If you want to know how it works, look at their research.
Don't worry about what people told you, just read the paper above and it tells all.
The paper also addresses the advantages of using neo magnets, something ignored by the copycats.
The "breaking coil" is why those JBL subs are very difficult to "bottom out".
I think those used to be owned by 72impala
The cut-down SMD v.1 that I saw had one coil & a single braking winding up higher on the former.Apparently, the new SMD's have a single coil, not spaced. I find that hard to believe
Also, do those custom ones on facebook not have a pole piece?