stereo imaging?

[maddog101 10+ year member]

Wouldnt using Frnt & Rear for front spkrs mess up the stereo imaging theory?

Click to read more...

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

Wtf. At least post in the right section and structure your question to where it makes sense.

I thought was gonna be a good thread, too, ****er.

 

[endofdays89 5,000+ posts]

i could live without stereo imaging, it's too hyped up by many audio experts.

 

[Vestax 10+ year member]

I could also live without anti-lock brakes. It's been too hype by manufacturer's, I've never seen it work.

 

[Side Show 10+ year member]

i'd say no......... goose

 

[Horsemanwill 10+ year member]

as i said in your other post if your deck uses the hi mid low setup instead of the front rear sub no it won't y won'tu comprehend that?

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

i could live without stereo imaging, it's too hyped up by many audio experts.

Of course you could live without something you have no idea about. Why would you think imaging is too hyped if you don't have it, heard it, or know the steps to achieving it?

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jeremy M 10+ year member]

Lol!

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

Of course you could live without something you have no idea about. Why would you think imaging is too hyped if you don't have it, heard it, or know the steps to achieving it?

x2

A good, centered setup makes a world of difference as far as how you perceive the sound coming towards you...you're actually able to listen in the same direction you're driving, instead of listening to the side where you're cheapy coaxials are distorting their *** off in your stock door locations as they're being powered by the HU.