First off, the RL-p ain't usin' no foam surround my man! Our first generation drivers came with santoprene surrounds, unfortunately the santoprene required a special treatment of the cone to adhere properly with the glue we were using (admittedly, this led to but a few driver failures) so we currently use butadiene acrylonitrile (NBR) rubber for our surround material. It does have a more reflective look to it than the traditional santoprene, which may lend it to appear as foam in the proper light, but it is indeed rubber. Additionally, while rubber boasts longevity over foam (and I just downright love the rub! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif ), foam can be a viable alternative for certain drivers since it can move with less resistance as opposed to its rubber counterpart.08-13-2005 6:28 PM
Also, on the RL-P, I'm not sure still about foam surrounds. Rubber seems to make more of a "quality" statement and it has also lasted longer, for me, in the past. If there is a performance reason, I can certainly stand by using foam surrounds. Otherwise, I'd guess that an increase in cost would be negligible, all things considered. If someone has information as to why foam is used (instead of rubber) on such high-end subwoofers as the W7, XXX, and RL-P, please post to help with the information sharing.
You're the man, Mike! That's EXACTLY what this needed! Thank you.First off, the RL-p ain't usin' no foam surround my man! Our first generation drivers came with santoprene surrounds, unfortunately the santoprene required a special treatment of the cone to adhere properly with the glue we were using (admittedly, this led to but a few driver failures) so we currently use butadiene acrylonitrile (NBR) rubber for our surround material. It does have a more reflective look to it than the traditional santoprene, which may lend it to appear as foam in the proper light, but it is indeed rubber. Additionally, while rubber boasts longevity over foam (and I just downright love the rub! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif ), foam can be a viable alternative for certain drivers since it can move with less resistance as opposed to its rubber counterpart.
.. and for kicks![]()
http://www.soundsplinter.com/images/videos/SoundSplinter_RL-p15.wmv
First off, the RL-p ain't usin' no foam surround my man! Our first generation drivers came with santoprene surrounds, unfortunately the santoprene required a special treatment of the cone to adhere properly with the glue we were using (admittedly, this led to but a few driver failures) so we currently use butadiene acrylonitrile (NBR) rubber for our surround material. It does have a more reflective look to it than the traditional santoprene, which may lend it to appear as foam in the proper light, but it is indeed rubber. Additionally, while rubber boasts longevity over foam (and I just downright love the rub! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif ), foam can be a viable alternative for certain drivers since it can move with less resistance as opposed to its rubber counterpart.
.. and for kicks![]()
http://www.soundsplinter.com/images/videos/SoundSplinter_RL-p15.wmv
empty boxes?that vidio was painful- do you see what i see in the background? can they all be???