Given what I've learned about this guy's behavior on more than one forum regarding giving out free stuff, I didn't see it as a joke. To me, it could have been interpreted in a few different ways.lol, that is probally what happened, a joke misinterpreted
Judging from some of your posts in the last couple days, it would appear on the outside that you may have a vendetta against Ant. I agree with some of your points and you both make quality products, but 'stepping the line' isnt going to get anything done on this forum //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifGiven what I've learned about this guy's behavior on more than one forum regarding giving out free stuff, I didn't see it as a joke. To me, it could have been interpreted in a few different ways.
But I've never known Squeak to be shady or a liar, so I guess his defense stands with me.
I guess I just find the whole thing pretty interesting, that's all. And I'm posting this on my own and not in defense of anyone at CAE for whatever reason.
Whatever...in the end I feel that if consumers make better decisions about spending their money on the best materials for the job, it's all good. That's my story and I'm using quality adhesive to stick to it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
You sound like someone who is biased, but trying to appear neutral.But I've never known Squeak to be shady or a liar, so I guess his defense stands with me.
No vendetta. He posted, I questioned. That's it!Judging from some of your posts in the last couple days, it would appear on the outside that you may have a vendetta against Ant. I agree with some of your points and you both make quality products, but 'stepping the line' isnt going to get anything done on this forum //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
I am! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Who isn't?You sound like someone who is biased, but trying to appear neutral.
Between this, and your elementary attempt to discredit SDS, Im left wondering if you aren't the guy making the accusation on the other forum, or affiliated with Cascade in some way.
Fair enough. I wasnt trying to call you out, it was just what I had noticed. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifNo vendetta. He posted, I questioned. That's it!
Agreed, it's not going to get anything done. But the questions the OP asked were legit in my view and deserve further looking-into. That WAS the original intent of this post, whether you want to think of it that way or not.
Why would I keep wondering, when you just confirmed my suspicion? How can you not know what Im talking about, when in the same reply you answered my question? You understood me just fine.I'm a CAE distributor. Keep wondering the last part, b/c I don't know what you're talking about.
You're a fucking numbskull idiot BLATANTLY taking things out of context...
So, in other words, no matter how obvious the joke was, and no matter how obviously stupid it would be to be reality, AND how stupid it would be to post about it on the open forum IF it were real and not just a joke, not to mention the banning had a logical reason beyond your accusation of foul play... in spite of all this, you want to sit there and play the 'nobody really knows for sure but those two guys' game. Clearly you are trying to smear people here, the only real question left is what your motives are. Either way, you fail.Welp, no one knows for sure what exactly happened between SS and Squeak except for those guys themselves. Sarcastic or not, he still put it out there and Squeak replied the way he did.
The way I see it is this thread could have been much better if nGizzum posted much earlier in it, that way we'd all know who the real troll is...because he's brought nothing to the tread other than his usual asinine comments that, IMHO, showcase the typical behavior of the CA.com Goof Troop Mod Squad. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif
Oh, I totally think that's a justified decision. But I think I was more of an isolated incident.I'd certainly never buy from CAE the way they've represented themselves on the forum.
nG
All I'll say, as a rep and a vendor in the industry, is that one tends to "hear" things. You think it was obvious and stupid, I don't. If it was never posted in the open in the first place there'd be no speculation.So, in other words, no matter how obvious the joke was, and no matter how obviously stupid it would be to be reality, AND how stupid it would be to post about it on the open forum IF it were real and not just a joke, not to mention the banning had a logical reason beyond your accusation of foul play... in spite of all this, you want to sit there and play the 'nobody really knows for sure but those two guys' game. Clearly you are trying to smear people here, the only real question left is what your motives are. Either way, you fail.
I for one do not believe you have a sincere bone in your body about this topic, at this point. You start out your latest reply with more accusational innuendo, and end it with displaying your animosity towards the moderation of this board. It doesn't take x-ray vision to see through you. You, and your accusations here, are quite transparent.