Science vs. The Bible!

[Synyster97XLT 10+ year member]

Alright, we need a raging debate. Right now. I'm an atheist myself, post your opinions, and try no to get too angry with one another.

Click to read more...

 

[BeAlLsTaR13 10+ year member]

the bible was written, science has facts to back up their theories

 

[Synyster97XLT 10+ year member]

Science can fly planes across oceans. Religion sends them straight into buildings.

 

[TnT_Sounds 10+ year member]

one thing to look at, is if you are claiming yourself to be 'atheist', then you must believe there is a god, because without one there wouldn't be one for you people to 'hate'

I will take the facts over fiction any day

 

[Synyster97XLT 10+ year member]

I don't believe in a god. And I certainly don't hate other religions.

 

[TnT_Sounds 10+ year member]

it's been debated before..

search //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[spencer321 10+ year member]

there is no god, if there was then that immaculate conception shit woulda never happened, he'd done Marry right and she woulda been screaming "oh god **** me" and he woulda been like "take it all you *****, have my baby oh jesus christ"

 

[plugitin 5,000+ posts]

facts over fiction any day

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

one thing to look at, is if you are claiming yourself to be 'atheist', then you must believe there is a god, because without one there wouldn't be one for you people to 'hate'

That's a pretty *** backwards way of thinking, and a very generalized statement that doesn't really make sese at all.

Hey, if you claim to not believe that a little leprauchan is what makes the ice cubes in your freezer, then you must believe in one, otherwise there'd be nothing for you to not believe in.

See how that works(doesn't)?

 

[thegreatestpenn 5,000+ posts]

we've been there we've done this.

do a search and revive an old thread instead of hogging bandwidth with this useless debate

 

[plugitin 5,000+ posts]

That's a pretty *** backwards way of thinking, and a very generalized statement that doesn't really make sese at all.
Hey, if you claim to not believe that a little leprauchan is what makes the ice cubes in your freezer, then you mut believe i one, otrherwise there'd be nothing for you to not believe in.

See how that works(doesn't)?

i thought it was a midget in there...wtf?!?!

 

[Blue Fury 10+ year member]

reghost

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

i thought it was a midget in there...wtf?!?!

It is a midget, just an Irish one. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[TnT_Sounds 10+ year member]

That's a pretty *** backwards way of thinking, and a very generalized statement that doesn't really make sese at all.
Hey, if you claim to not believe that a little leprauchan is what makes the ice cubes in your freezer, then you mut believe i one, otrherwise there'd be nothing for you to not believe in.

See how that works(doesn't)?

made sense to me

athesim = lack of belief in God or active disbelief in God.

But yet Atheism is a form of religion if I'm not mistaken. So to not believe in something that is not there is rather '*** backwards' to me. If there was no 'Bible' or any other form of religious matter, there would be no Atheists. Thats how I see it at least. To claim to be something that has dis-beliefs in something fictional seems like 2 negatives and cancels eachother out. I'm still lost on the whole 'Atheism' format though.

 

[thegreatestpenn 5,000+ posts]

for all that say the Bible is full of lies, go to a hospital. Science can "lie" as well. i see it all the time. Heck my mother is a living witness