SB Acoustics SB17NRX35C/ Vifa DX25TG05/ Need Help

if you make those pods you'll be able to run a slim 8 up front.Have you looked into Hertz?

http://www.hertzaudiovideo.com/default_en.htm

they make an slim that you could xover high that has good mid bass plus take large amounts of power, so that you can get loud.

they also can fix into small enclosers,like speaker pods.

I might up grade some day to these 8's

what a about six by nine mid from ID

http://www.woofersetc.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_ID=5717
that would be a good choice. they have just about the same cone area as 8"s, and they sound sweet.

 
remember those SB's are very low power & you said you wanted to go louder!

those speakers would sound much better active as well.

I've heard most hertz lines & i'm thinking about up grading to those fro my cdt audio 62i mids, which i'm starting not like my new mids.

 
remember those SB's are very low power & you said you wanted to go louder!those speakers would sound much better active as well.

I've heard most hertz lines & i'm thinking about up grading to those fro my cdt audio 62i mids, which i'm starting not like my new mids.
going active doesn't automatically make speakers or a system sound better.

 
going active doesn't always work for all speakers, but those SB would easier to control going active vs tring to make a passxover for them or trying to use a premade one.

I've played around with passive & active, & i would it mostly depends on your placement for your install, & deadening, headunit,& car acoustics

not one car brand is alike.

 
going active doesn't always work for all speakers, but those SB would easier to control going active vs tring to make a passxover for them or trying to use a premade one.
I've played around with passive & active, & i would it mostly depends on your placement for your install, & deadening, headunit,& car acoustics

not one car brand is alike.
how is that? going active is just being able to choose your own desired xover points and slopes. If you were to choose a xover point and slope that would be exactly the same a certain passive xover, it should sound just about the same, other than the passive xover stealing some power (given the same setup, car, speakers, amps, ect) .

 
processing can be good & bad, I like to Keep It Simple now.

oh you where saying that active & passive can sound the same? I think active can & will sound better by opening it up. some drivers need that to correct it. I have a pair of cdt audio 62i which i have run active & they sounde dso sweet on 250 per channel xovered as i want it to, but when i went back to cdt's passive xover it didnt sound right.

when a company test there drivers it isn't always done in real world testing or it wasn't done in my car door, so what i'm saying is that on my scion tc door which is very lagre for a car typical car door for the best sound would be for me go active & do lots processing.

plus if your'e going to use home drivers vs car drivers car it will take much more processing to correct a driver to a car acoustics.

Qts,Qes,Fs aren't alike.

like home drivers better

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

About this thread

Millertime1028

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
Millertime1028
Joined
Location
Long Island, New York
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
44
Views
3,507
Last reply date
Last reply from
okiedokie
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top