Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="okiedokie" data-source="post: 5374727" data-attributes="member: 599205">processing can be good &amp;amp; bad, I like to Keep It Simple now.oh you&nbsp; where saying that active &amp;amp; passive can sound the same? I think active can &amp;amp; will sound better by opening it up. some drivers need that to correct it. I have a pair of cdt audio 62i which i have run active &amp;amp; they sounde dso sweet on 250 per channel xovered as i want it to, but when i went back to cdt&#039;s passive xover it didnt sound right.when a company test there drivers it isn&#039;t always done in real world testing or it wasn&#039;t done in my car door, so what i&#039;m saying is that on my scion tc door which is very lagre for a car typical car door for the best sound would be for me go active &amp;amp; do lots processing.plus if your&#039;e going to use home drivers vs car drivers car it will take much more processing to correct a driver to a car acoustics.Qts,Qes,Fs aren&#039;t alike.like home drivers better</blockquote>

[QUOTE="okiedokie, post: 5374727, member: 599205"] processing can be good & bad, I like to Keep It Simple now. oh you where saying that active & passive can sound the same? I think active can & will sound better by opening it up. some drivers need that to correct it. I have a pair of cdt audio 62i which i have run active & they sounde dso sweet on 250 per channel xovered as i want it to, but when i went back to cdt's passive xover it didnt sound right. when a company test there drivers it isn't always done in real world testing or it wasn't done in my car door, so what i'm saying is that on my scion tc door which is very lagre for a car typical car door for the best sound would be for me go active & do lots processing. plus if your'e going to use home drivers vs car drivers car it will take much more processing to correct a driver to a car acoustics. Qts,Qes,Fs aren't alike. like home drivers better [/QUOTE]

Verification