sa 8 gettin low?

lol you know what **** you guys im only 16 and i knew what that meant but my ******* friend who has a system thought i was talking spanish to him lol

 
12" drivers don't have 12" cones, they are close to 9 3/4" Its called "sd" and its a part of the more complete sensitivity specification or sometimes called "spl" or splsens.

You need to look at the mfr spec, but 8's have about 26 square inches, so four of them would have about 100 square inches so you're off by a factor of twice the surface area or about 6dB... huge error!

12's about 75 square inches of area or 150 for a pair or about 50% more than four 8's.

If xmax is equal, then the 12's also have the displacement advantage down low. If the BL is equal then the 8's have a lower Q and can operate in a smaller box and have the power handling advantage.

If you have the space, then two 12's have higher value. 8's are really not an optimal size for subwoofers so they tend to be nitch and nostalgic, but sometimes irresistible!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
4x 8's == 200 sq inches2x 12's = 226 sq inches //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif....

now both of those are accounting for literal dimensions which neither 1 is...but regardless the 12's have more cone area period...
12" drivers don't have 12" cones, they are close to 9 3/4" Its called "sd" and its a part of the more complete sensitivity specification or sometimes called "spl" or splsens.
You need to look at the mfr spec, but 8's have about 26 square inches, so four of them would have about 100 square inches so you're off by a factor of twice the surface area or about 6dB... huge error!

12's about 75 square inches of area or 150 for a pair or about 50% more than four 8's.

If xmax is equal, then the 12's also have the displacement advantage down low. If the BL is equal then the 8's have a lower Q and can operate in a smaller box and have the power handling advantage.

If you have the space, then two 12's have higher value. 8's are really not an optical size for subwoofers so they tend to be nitch and nostalgic.
but you are dead on either way //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

I figured if he didn't know how to do the basic math the rest would all be greek to him lol

you explanation however is very easy to make sense of even for someone that has no clue //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif kudos dude.

 
Yeah, gotta use sd values. Something that I found to be more accurate, yet still easy to do is just take the listed size of a woofer, say 12", and take off 2" when finding cone area. It's not exact, but good enough in most cases.

(4)8" woofers = 3^2(pi)(4) = 113in^2

(2)12" woofers = 5^2(pi)(2) = 157in^2

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

If your last problem was the same as this one, you know exactly where to start. Does it change based on vehicle speed or engine speed? Does the...
2
250
what ^ said. amp gain setting info, test tones are at the very bottom...
3
666
Thanks a ton for your suggestion to my rather long query, I ll follow it and see how it works out. Thanks again
2
810
Just for examples sake regarding electrical, I have 1400 watts total between both my amps and my system has no trouble running everything max...
27
2K

About this thread

09civic

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
09civic
Joined
Location
Melbourne, FL
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
22
Views
1,537
Last reply date
Last reply from
RAM_Designs
IMG_0005 (5) - Copy - Copy.JPG

Dan Medina

    Jun 17, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot 2024-05-31 182935.png

Doxquzme

    Jun 15, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top