iamamp3pimp
5,000+ posts
Bass Heads Entertainment
the XXX isnt even an SPL sub. I dont know why its being compared to a SoloX anyway. it wasmt meant for sheer output.
isn't it near 5 inches?b/c the 3" p-p that it travels, the 6kw it can take, and knowing RE is why.
Did you not read my earlier post, Pricewise RE REs=Comps, SR=CVR, SE=L5, and SX=L7, if you go by the same markup from dealer cost.Basically everything you said x2.
CompVR's are now the same price as the RE RE series and i'd put my money on the comp VR to have a slight edge in ouput on the mic.
an SE cost as much as an L7 and the L7 would walk all over the SE and output. SQ is another subject.
Hell for the price of a SE you can now get a w6v2 with some change left over...VERY compareable subs and JL is proven to the main stream.
I'd also put my money on the SoloX vs an XXX...not even bringing up the MX or MT because i'd bethe soloX would walk on both.
Before this sudden mainstream jump RE was a great value per perfomrance and where gaining popularity. Thank god they have the owner of USamps to help them along because i dont think they would have made it any other way.
/beating horse
the SoloX doesnt sound "bad" just doesnt sound good.the XXX isnt even an SPL sub. I dont know why its being compared to a SoloX anyway. it wasmt meant for sheer output.
the SoloX doesnt sound "bad" just doesnt sound good.
There are several people who say the new XXX is for about 20-40Hz and then its moot.
There are many more who say the MT, though loud, cannot take what the Solo can. I personally have never used either so what i say is nothing but a grain of salt.
6kw? man the **** thing wont take no 6kw....no for a daily setup which is what its for...b/c the 3" p-p that it travels, the 6kw it can take, and knowing RE is why.
My look on it?wow it looks clean, but i dont like it on how they are going to go mainstream.