Re: Proposal to Goob

[zachzchw 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif

Have fun fuckers.

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

ibtmflb

 

[arsonbob 10+ year member]

Nah I have 6flags 35mins from me and havent been there in over a decade...

Yeah, I havent been since like 5th grade, and even then it wasn't that grand. But, it's better than nothin'.

 

[bdawson72 5,000+ posts]

**** how do u get banned that quickly.....u havnt even been here that long how many posts do u have 300?

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

lol all teh banned members are in here. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif

 

[arsonbob 10+ year member]

*peeks head up

"Who me?"

 

[DaveVT 10+ year member]

But that thread had rules, I didnt say the rules were useful.
For all I kno nJizm might not be ever back, he might wanted to have some fun on his last night and decided to **** it all up

Now that my ban is lifted I feel I have to speak my mind. It doesnt matter if he wanted to have fun one last time or got bored or any of that shit. Fact is he was elected as a mod to keep the forum running smoothly. That also means he is supposed to be wise with the use of the priviledges he has. It doesnt mean he can get bored and start banning people to entertain himself. Nor does it mean he has the right to edit peoples sigs, thread titles, avatars or anything unless they breach the TOS. The admin gave him these priviledges I am guessing because he thought he would be responsible with them. He has proved he cant. It would not be unreasonable for him to be removed as a mod and replaced with someone that has a bit more restraint when they get bored. He has edited threads and users avatars and sigs simply because he disagrees or does not like what they have to say. Other mods have done the same thing. Many have had issues with MikeOfTulsa but to be honest at least he has been a fair and trustworthy moderator. At least as far as I know. So basically, everyone has a right to be a little angry at ngsm13. Anyway, just my .02

 

[gl0ck 10+ year member]

agree with teh raven

 

[gl0ck 10+ year member]

Iceteebone For mod 06

 

[bumpinne0n 10+ year member]

**** how do u get banned that quickly.....u havnt even been here that long how many posts do u have 300?

By viewing a certain thread. I've just got like 70 posts and I was banned for it too. It's over now though.

 

[njismisabiatch 10+ year member]

Now that my ban is lifted I feel I have to speak my mind. It doesnt matter if he wanted to have fun one last time or got bored or any of that shit. Fact is he was elected as a mod to keep the forum running smoothly. That also means he is supposed to be wise with the use of the priviledges he has. It doesnt mean he can get bored and start banning people to entertain himself. Nor does it mean he has the right to edit peoples sigs, thread titles, avatars or anything unless they breach the TOS. The admin gave him these priviledges I am guessing because he thought he would be responsible with them. He has proved he cant. It would not be unreasonable for him to be removed as a mod and replaced with someone that has a bit more restraint when they get bored. He has edited threads and users avatars and sigs simply because he disagrees or does not like what they have to say. Other mods have done the same thing. Many have had issues with MikeOfTulsa but to be honest at least he has been a fair and trustworthy moderator. At least as far as I know. So basically, everyone has a right to be a little angry at ngsm13. Anyway, just my .02

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

 

[project f-150 10+ year member]

Now that my ban is lifted I feel I have to speak my mind. It doesnt matter if he wanted to have fun one last time or got bored or any of that shit. Fact is he was elected as a mod to keep the forum running smoothly. That also means he is supposed to be wise with the use of the priviledges he has. It doesnt mean he can get bored and start banning people to entertain himself. Nor does it mean he has the right to edit peoples sigs, thread titles, avatars or anything unless they breach the TOS. The admin gave him these priviledges I am guessing because he thought he would be responsible with them. He has proved he cant. It would not be unreasonable for him to be removed as a mod and replaced with someone that has a bit more restraint when they get bored. He has edited threads and users avatars and sigs simply because he disagrees or does not like what they have to say. Other mods have done the same thing. Many have had issues with MikeOfTulsa but to be honest at least he has been a fair and trustworthy moderator. At least as far as I know. So basically, everyone has a right to be a little angry at ngsm13. Anyway, just my .02

I agree 100%. And yes I was one of the people banned for clicking on athread in this forum. I personally hope that piece of shit doesn't come back to this forum. I can't remember the last usefull post he made about anything related to car audio. All I can say is f*ck him!!

 

[DaveVT 10+ year member]

I say he needs to lose mod priviledges and be replaced by a more responsible member of this forum.

 

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

Im back...

 

[DaveVT 10+ year member]

Im back...

welcome back, feel free to join in on the bitching