My PLX amp mod idea sure raises hairs on people.
I've been talking to a QSC employee and he thinks -> 'yikes'.
Dan W. raises the eyebrow;
http://forum.carstereos.org/t58418-qsc-plx3402-upgrade.html
... and now on the AVS forum {power supply bone head thread},
someone comes out of the closet and makes his first post telling me
to beware.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=641883
.. not to mention the cold shoulder treatment I got on the pro audio forums where they closed
my thread on the subject.
Party poopers! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/moon.gif.9d317aec3339ffe7fde0638df52c628a.gif
One of the points in doing these experiments is to have first hand data
on how the amp performs under the conditions I give it. I didn't do any
mods yet and I managed to blow up the amp to see how far I can push it.
No big deal, the amp is fixed and ready for action again. I already did the input
cap test, next is output cap test, the one everyone fears and everyone
trying to dissuade me.
.. ok .. for sake of argument .. I do the mod, the amp smokes.. I fix the amp..
I have data now. The amp design can't handle the mod, what's the big deal ?
What if the amp doesn't smoke and runs for months with mod ? Then I know the
amplifier is robust enough to handle the mod, then I mod the rest of them
to have more rail energy storage. /done stamp/ {monster house}.
If people never try things that are 'black sheep', then they'd never learn anything
extraordinary. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif