Assuming the source always sent 1V, then yes, it would alwyas be at "full volume". You do know the source would not always send 1V, right?Scenario:
I run a HT cd player to my zx2500. HT cd player has a voltage output of 1v.
Am I supposed to "set" the zx2500 to 1v? Sure, I could, but in this case it would always be at full volume.
I'd say I would turn the gain up and down to control the volume from the source.
Something that controls volume = volume control.
Well, not "always"... it would of course be proportionate to the true "source" being the CD itself.Assuming the source always sent 1V, then yes, it would alwyas be at "full volume". You do know the source would not always send 1V, right?
because noise is always present. The higher voltage just boosts the signal enough above the noise floor to 'mask' the noise.How? If the maximum sensitivity on your amplifier is say 5V and your source sends 5V at the desired listening volume, you're using the amplifier at what it was rated at that volume. How is that horrible?
And I agree, and with most decks, you need at least 4v.because noise is always present. The higher voltage just boosts the signal enough above the noise floor to 'mask' the noise.
Dave Navone/RC even said it themselves that you should look into a deck with atleast 2v or more.
I wanna run my head unit's preouts at .35 //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gifactually it's the impendance you should look for. the lower the better![]()
OK, when you said maximum were you reffering to maximum sensitivity or maximum numerical value on the setting?because noise is always present. The higher voltage just boosts the signal enough above the noise floor to 'mask' the noise.
Dave Navone/RC even said it themselves that you should look into a deck with atleast 2v or more.
It doesn't matter what "WE " know.......Mr. Potts is correct. There are 1000 professionals out there (including the very folks that make his equipment) and "WE" are all wrong. We should be taking lessons from Mr. Potts. David Navone and Richard Clark will be VERY impressed. I can't believe all these people were lying to me during training. Mark Eldridge is gonna hear about his incompetant lessons he's been giving all of us in his class. Oh well..back to the drawing boards. I'll be sure to send a link of this to a few of my sponsors and see their take on it also. Appearantly, we've all been taught incorrectly.admit it, I'm right... go ahead, its ok, you'll live... maybe.
It doesn't matter what "normal" use is (although most anything with remote gain uses the gain as a volume control)... all that matters is the definition, and, its, DRUMMMMMROLLLLLL a volume control.
dam skippy!It doesn't matter what "WE " know.......Mr. Potts is correct. There are 1000 professionals out there (including the very folks that make his equipment) and "WE" are all wrong. We should be taking lessons from Mr. Potts. David Navone and Richard Clark will be VERY impressed. I can't believe all these people were lying to me during training. Mark Eldridge is gonna hear about his incompetant lessons he's been giving all of us in his class. Oh well..back to the drawing boards. I'll be sure to send a link of this to a few of my sponsors and see their take on it also. Appearantly, we've all been taught incorrectly.
That is correct.i've never seen an amp w/ "0" gain.i've only seen a range of 9v-2v on amps. so no matter how low you set the gain, there'll be voltage, therefore watts.