PG Xenon 100.4 vs PG Ryval

[hyrolincstmz 10+ year member]

Ive got a PG Xenon i havent used in a couple of yrs and when it was bought it was a high end amp. Was wondering what you guys think of running it to two sets of components that have a 100watt rms.

And why did they label it as a 100.4 instead of a 400.4 ?(im used to amps being labeled with its total power followed by its channels... EX: 1000.4 would = 250 watts per ch)

Click to read more...

 

[2lo2flo 10+ year member]

Keep the Xenon 100.4 Its an amazing sq amp!

The newer ryval stuff is pretty crappy

 

[Ignatowski 5,000+ posts]

late Xenons were great,early ones broke allot.....dead on ratings too

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

Xenons were some of my favorites, still have two actually. The naming was for 100 watts going to each of its 4 channels. I much prefer that then the bloated numbers other's use.