I had to EQ the shit out of them...but they sound fantastic.i had some and did not think they were very nice.. at all..
I had them running passive then i used the mids by themselves for mid bass still not the greatest..I had to EQ the shit out of them...but they sound fantastic.
Were you running active or passive? HUUUUUUGE difference.
OK, so you used them passive then active? How much power?I had them running passive then i used the mids by themselves for mid bass still not the greatest..
better phase relation with the sub?I've found that while going ACTIVE with my 8053, I gain quite a bit of midbass by using a 24db/oct lp on my mids instead of 12 or 18db/oct...
That's a nice old deck.I've found that while going ACTIVE with my 8053, I gain quite a bit of midbass by using a 24db/oct lp on my mids instead of 12 or 18db/oct...
I like it so much I'm about to buy a spare just in case something happens to this one. Either I'll stick with 8053's, or I'll move up to a P9 combo...nothing else really interests me.That's a nice old deck.
Not running a sub right wow. Happens at any frequency I lp them at, all the way from 200hz-5khz. Choosing a different crossover point doesn't change much, but going from even an 18db slope to a 24db slope will give me quite a noticable gain.better phase relation with the sub?
Why is there a huge difference?I had to EQ the shit out of them...but they sound fantastic.
Were you running active or passive? HUUUUUUGE difference.