My FI Q12s

[denim 5,000+ posts]

nice subs

 

[dB Dom 10+ year member]

Let see heres the specs,

MAG / Q

Qts .41 / .44

FS 27 / 30

Mms 228/211

spl 85.7/84.8

Vas 39.7/48.3

Id say they are pretty **** similar drivers. The motors look identical except for the chrome of course. The top and bottom plate also look identical, there might be a few mm difference but not much.

 

[dB Dom 10+ year member]

Loyd, do you have any side by side pics yet for comparo?

Id be willing the bet that they look identical.

 

[90accordman 5,000+ posts]

id like to see side by side also as i look at diff pics they look REAl close

 

[CBFryman2 5,000+ posts]

Let see heres the specs,
MAG / Q

Qts .41 / .44

FS 27 / 30

Mms 228/211

spl 85.7/84.8

Vas 39.7/48.3

Id say they are pretty **** similar drivers. The motors look identical except for the chrome of course. The top and bottom plate also look identical, there might be a few mm difference but not much.

There are other parameters that greatly affect how a driver performs on top of the fact that thoes "suttle" differences can make quite an impact along with that being on paper and not nessicarilly real life. I'm not saying the Q wont give a mag a run for its money. I'm saying that people should stop speculating and making up BS.

For one the mag has higher Bl which leads me to beleive they have different magnet slugs, probably different poles among other things.

and 1 Mag does not equal 2 Q's in price. Not even MSRP of the mag.

 

[CBFryman2 5,000+ posts]

id like to see side by side also as i look at diff pics they look REAl close

Agian, I want to emphasize (not to you, to everyone) looks aren't everything. There are a lot of TC9 drivers...not all are equal. And in that case we know all are the same motor and not just similar back plates with double stack magnets. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[dB Dom 10+ year member]

I guess time will tell.

 

[90accordman 5,000+ posts]

meh i will wait for testing for performance data, i was speaking off just visual looks

 

[CBFryman2 5,000+ posts]

I understand. We will see how loyd's tests go. Manny is getting some Mags I beleive. Shawn and I might do some drop in SPL testing in the comming month. We shall see.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[90accordman 5,000+ posts]

if so ...some vids please, i have yet to see a Fi vid yet myself

 

[CBFryman2 5,000+ posts]

Vids are always a must. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[dB Dom 10+ year member]

Yea ROE doesnt even have FI yet, so this would be the first.

 

[UndercoverPunk 5,000+ posts]

Let see heres the specs,
MAG / Q

Qts .41 / .44

FS 27 / 30

Mms 228/211

spl 85.7/84.8

Vas 39.7/48.3

Id say they are pretty **** similar drivers. The motors look identical except for the chrome of course. The top and bottom plate also look identical, there might be a few mm difference but not much.

You left out alot of other specs.

Q and Mag.

You put 2 motors in front of me, no plating, just raw steel.

I'll bet you $100 I can tell you which is which in less than 2 seconds.

Hell I'll do the test blindfolded if you give me 5 seconds.

 

[mazdakid 5,000+ posts]

wow thats cool man

 

[90accordman 5,000+ posts]

You left out alot of other specs.
Q and Mag.

You put 2 motors in front of me, no plating, just raw steel.

I'll bet you $100 I can tell you which is which in less than 2 seconds.

Hell I'll do the test blindfolded if you give me 5 seconds.

I have 2 nutter Butter Cookies with your name all over them