drifter180 10+ year member
Junior Member
i tried a search but didn't find a lot....how are these subs? the pics and specs look cool but how is ACTUAL performance? SPL? SQ?
thanks
thanks
OUCH!! I admit, Ive never heard the Brahmas but in my experience the MTX9500's are painfully loud and still have excellent SQ. Im willin to wager that technically speaking the MTX9500 is a superior sub. Brahma just sounds too... swap-meet kinda like Performance Tecknique, i could be very wrong though. I heard 1500 watts RMS from a Hi Fonics Brutus Amp pushin 2 10's. Nearly took my head off, in the homie's car! Sledgehammer loaded subs are burl, they have be, at the very least, the bombest Pre-Loaded subs in existence. The 9500's are in my opinion (limited experiences) competitive w/ JL W7's, RF power stage 2's. Kicker L7's for sure. and a few handfull of others. The subs have a break in period of like 20 hrs. or somthin. They are real real hard! Im sure they arent the best out there or many might prefer the W7 to the Thunder9500. But **** 2 10's!!!!! so hard!!! so very hard!!!There's better for the money. The brahma comes to mind.
*sigh* I guarentee each and every one of you he has never heard a 9500 before. It's easy for somebody to jump on the bandwagon of a great sub, like a brahma, but don't bash the 9500 until you have heard it, please. Ignorance is shown. I have heard both, both of which were in great boxes and the 9500 was great, as was the Brahma. You need to go and listen to both of them yourself, and the XXX while you're at it.A Brahma will be the **** out of a MTX 9500 all day long given the right enclosure. Even with a 9500 in a Sledgehammer enclosure, it couldn't begin to sound as good as a Brahma. Also the Brahma will most likely kill a 9500 in SPL. Brahmas are already proven to be a superior woofer. Just do a search on this forum and you will find your answer. .
*sigh* the Brahma has been shown to produce output and clarity levels that rival the W7, hmm.....bandwagon or quality sub? The brahma and XXX, given proper enclosure and power, will hang with and possibly beat the 9500 in all aspects of sound reproduction. It is all in the install, as with anything, but given proper installs I would bet on the brahma here. Also, nobody bashed the 9500, they jsut stated that it was an inferior driver to the brahma, which is nothing to be ashamed about.*sigh* I guarentee each and every one of you he has never heard a 9500 before. It's easy for somebody to jump on the bandwagon of a great sub, like a brahma, but don't bash the 9500 until you have heard it, please. Ignorance is shown.
I do believe we have witnessed the most ignorant comment of all time. Spuninsocal clearly doesn't have a clue as to what he is talking about. How he could compare a Performance Tecknique to a Brahma is beyond human comprehension. A Brahma will be the **** out of a MTX 9500 all day long given the right enclosure. Even with a 9500 in a Sledgehammer enclosure, it couldn't begin to sound as good as a Brahma. Also the Brahma will most likely kill a 9500 in SPL. Brahmas are already proven to be a superior woofer. Just do a search on this forum and you will find your answer. To quote bluevilevo8, "There's better for the money".