Monkey Pox

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You posted what supported your case...

I was waiting for that. Do you want me to post the link?

 

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

I posted the most important part.

Which for you is the clickbait headline that makes you feel good because it fits your confirmation bias.

If you had ever read that why did you try to pass it off as evidence when I asked you for evidence? Do you not understand the difference between scientific method and statistics or were you trying to be dishonest thinking that nobody here would know the difference and call you out?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Which for you is the clickbait headline that makes you feel good because it fits your confirmation bias.

If you had ever read that why did you try to pass it off as evidence when I asked you for evidence? Do you not understand the difference between scientific method and statistics or were you trying to be dishonest thinking that nobody here would know the difference and call you out?

I claimed something and then I posted proof to prove my claim. What more do you want? If you think my proof is wrong then prove it wrong. I don't know what else to tell you.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Caaaaaalifornia Loooove

‘Mitcho Thompson, of Northern California, recently tested positive for Covid-19 and monkeypox at the same time, according to NBC Bay Area.’

Patient who had monkeypox & Covid at same time reveals 'weeks of misery'

A CALIFORNIAN man has revealed he had Covid and monkeypox at the same time – and his symptoms left him in bed during “weeks of misery.” Mitcho Thompson, of Northern California, re…

www.the-sun.com

 

[hispls 5,000+ posts]

I claimed something and then I posted proof to prove my claim. What more do you want? If you think my proof is wrong then prove it wrong. I don't know what else to tell you.

No, you posted some statistical analysis and I already explained the obvious glaring flaws in the selection of data. The only thing that proved is that you're being dishonest or do not understand what clinical trials are. You certainly had no explanation for my questions and reservations about the validity of those "studies".

ClinicalTrials.gov

clinicaltrials.gov

FDA approval process has always required 2 clinical trials to be performed and then reviewed. The EXPERTS at the CDC set the bar at requiring that before determining if a new drug or procedure is safe and effective. Why don't you trust the experts? Why do you suppose the EXPERTS require two clinical trials and not just some statistical analysis to approve new drugs?

Really though this is getting tiresome. You're obviously just going to double-down on stupid forever and when no clinical trail is ever performed to validate any of this you'll still be dislocating your arm patting yourself on the back that your filthy bandanna around your mouth and the injections you took are the reason half of humanity didn't die of plague.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

No, you posted some statistical analysis and I already explained the obvious glaring flaws in the selection of data. The only thing that proved is that you're being dishonest or do not understand what clinical trials are. You certainly had no explanation for my questions and reservations about the validity of those "studies".

ClinicalTrials.gov

clinicaltrials.gov

FDA approval process has always required 2 clinical trials to be performed and then reviewed. The EXPERTS at the CDC set the bar at requiring that before determining if a new drug or procedure is safe and effective. Why don't you trust the experts? Why do you suppose the EXPERTS require two clinical trials and not just some statistical analysis to approve new drugs?

Really though this is getting tiresome. You're obviously just going to double-down on stupid forever and when no clinical trail is ever performed to validate any of this you'll still be dislocating your arm patting yourself on the back that your filthy bandanna around your mouth and the injections you took are the reason half of humanity didn't die of plague.

Read for yourself kid.

COVID-19 Vaccines Reduce Hospitalization and Death Rates, Contrary to Social Media Claims - FactCheck.org

Those who are not vaccinated against COVID-19 are more prone to serious illness and are dying at higher rates than those who are vaccinated. But partisan social media accounts, including a post by a member of former President Donald Trump's campaign legal team, continue to misleadingly suggest...

www.factcheck.org

 

[Clifff150 10+ year member]

I don’t think you understand what hispls is telling you.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I don’t think you understand what hispls is telling you.

The article is all that matters

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I don’t think you understand what hispls is telling you.

He wanted studies didn't he?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

The article is all that matters

The article goes into all of the studies that were done. Read up.

 

[Clifff150 10+ year member]

He’s talking about specific types of studies. Not just “studies” claimed in an article.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

He’s talking about specific types of studies. Not just “studies” claimed in an article.

O.k. Apparently he thinks he a medical expert who can shit on the MAYO clinic and New England Journal of Medicine. I believe and respect both of those entities. To each his own.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

O.k. Apparently he thinks he a medical expert who can shit on the MAYO clinic and New England Journal of Medicine. I believe and respect both of those entities. To each his own.

Anybody who doesn't agree with you is shiiting on mayo...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Anybody who doesn't agree with you is shiiting on mayo...

He won't believe two of the most respected medical authorities in the United States. IMO that is shittimg on them.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

He won't believe two of the most respected medical authorities in the United States. IMO that is shittimg on them.

You're posting basically opinion pieces about studies instead of the studies...big difference...