Nice appeal to authority, there.
I'll give careful consideration to the results when and if they ever do any clinical studies using double blind RCT, assuming the methodology doesn't have too many holes in it. What I don't trust from anybody is "studies". Show me double blind randomized control trials to test a hypothesis, otherwise this shit is just an excercise in statistics manipulation and NOT science.
That's a cop out. We don't need double blind studies to know that evolution exists. I didn't read the study, but if the sample size is statistically large enough you can merely use infection rate of the population at large to calculate the missing variable and get rel
8th grade science class where they explain how the scientific method works. What's your medical background? Perhaps when you did your residency at the mayo clinic they taught you some new kind of scientific method where you can just skip the double blind randomized control trials part? Do tell us about that.
You doomsday cult people really get unhinged to defend your priests.
Double blind randomized controls are not the only way science can be conducted, ie evolution, relativity.