long shot but im going try

keefy248
10+ year member

BID BIG
I know it hard times and we all want things.so my question is who feels as if buyers and sellers should create payments with each other. I have my own little plan work out but want your comments before i post a draft not that it would matter but its atleast a try.

 
I've done lay aways...they made payments...when final payment was received I sent out


Thats honestly not a bad idea, keeps someone else from getting an item you want. Most people on here are have issues money wise at the moment, (who aint //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif ) but still lets them what they want. But, I agree it should be between the buyer and seller as an option.

Only issue with that is, most people are selling something because they need the money right now, if not for another purchase, something else that came up, so its not always a option for them.

Good suggestion though...

 
IT WOULD GO LIKE THIS

1. 25% INITIAL PAYMENT, BIWEEKLY PAYMENTS UNTIL PAID OFF

2. CANCELLATION- MISS A PAYMENT HAVE 3 DAYS TO CONTACT SELLER ABOUT PAYMENT

3. Seller has the right to give u an extended payment or reimburse and repost there product.If seller agrees and buyer fails to pay within the agreed time seller keeps money and buyer will only receive 12.5% for prolonging a sale .Seller can then sell for remaining balance owed.

4. If 50% IS PUT DOWN AS A INITIAL PAYMENT THERE IS LITTLE BACKING OUT BUT SELLER WILL HAVE TO GIVE A MONTHS TIME FOR PAYMENT TO BE MADE.AT THE TIME IF BUYER TERMINATES THE DEAL 25% REIMBURSEMENT OR SELLER CAN LOWER YOUR PAYMENTS BUT U WILL HAVE TO BUY.

I Know you guys like wtf ever but again i said it was a try.

 
Thats honestly not a bad idea, keeps someone else from getting an item you want. Most people on here are have issues money wise at the moment, (who aint //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif ) but still lets them what they want. But, I agree it should be between the buyer and seller as an option.
Only issue with that is, most people are selling something because they need the money right now, if not for another purchase, something else that came up, so its not always a option for them.

Good suggestion though...
true but wouldnt you rather have something than nothing atleast if u get partial money it want be as big as of burden on u.but again between seller and buyer

 
This is basically a free pass for scammer's to keep money coming in. There are very few people on here I would give weekly payment's to for a item not in my possession. I don't picture many seller's sending out a item on a payment plan either. There is just no protection at all for anyone. The only way I would do it is half now and half within the next 2 week's.

 
This is basically a free pass for scammer's to keep money coming in. There are very few people on here I would give weekly payment's to for a item not in my possession. I don't picture many seller's sending out a item on a payment plan either. There is just no protection at all for anyone. The only way I would do it is half now and half within the next 2 week's.
i guess i didnt look at that that way but thats why im saying a item like 500 and over then its extrotion cuz i think the law is 300 n over.who wants a felony on something as simple as car audio a retard cuz the cant work to many places.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

keefy248

10+ year member
BID BIG
Thread starter
keefy248
Joined
Location
DETROIT,MI
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
16
Views
1,076
Last reply date
Last reply from
audioholic
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top