*sigh* Not this discussion again.
Sealed boxes give you a flatter, more natural response curve. Vented designs give unnatural spikes in output across the frequency spectrum (not a flat response). This is the main reason to chose sealed over vented for SQ applications (phasing is another reason).
JL Audio and I disagree on their wording. I know where they are coming from though: vented systems control cone motion more, so less cone motion = less distortion. In very simplistic terms, thats true. But for a given excursion level, vented enclosures (single reflex and dual reflex) do not output less distortion. Also, distoriton is a bit harder to hear in vented designs (especially bandpass). JL's wording is very misleading. For example, a bandpass enclosure is very good at masking distortion noises the speaker may be making. On the surface that seems like a good thing (as JL's wording implies), but it also leads to problems. You can be doing great harm to your speaker(s) and not even realize it with a bandpass.... the sub's in there banging away and all you hear is that boom-boom-boom one note wonder. The sub's in there stressing, and the box is making a single note sound that's overpowering the rest of the system, but hey JL Audio says its less distortion than a sealed system would be... must be true SQ there right?
"Distortion" can be described many different way. There's signal distortion, speaker distortion, and there's sound wave distortion. Disrupting a
ny of those three ultimately 'distorts' the final sound. *shrug*