Kicker vs JBL

[hondarider 10+ year member]

These are the two models i was looking at:

http://techronics.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&product_id=3948&aff=72182

http://www.techronics.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_ID=4932

I know that the kicker is refurbished. Is there any difference between the kx350.4 and zx350.4? It would cost about an extra 40-50 dollars to get the zx model. The JBL seems really cheap and it has 2 25 amp fuses compared to 2 20s not sure if that would mean its less efficient or more powerful. Which one would you pick?

Click to read more...

 

[aaa70389 10+ year member]

don't go by fuse size but i have a jbl px300.4 and it ran my highs good so i would go w/ the jbl

 

[j3bus2k3 5,000+ posts]

JBL all the way...

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

the ZX is just the newer version, both have 60x4, the JBL has 140x2 with a 12db,while the Kicker has 175x2 with an 18db...

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

don't go by fuse size but i have a jbl px300.4 and it ran my highs good so i would go w/ the jbl

yeah, I have the same amp this guy has and i have been pleased. no problems at all.

 

[///M5 10+ year member]

to power what?

 

[BassAddictJ 5,000+ posts]

i vote kicker. im not sure if the JBL has teh crown technology in that particular model. if it has crown in it then JBL for sure...if not then the kick is a ****ign solid *** amp thatll do the job better IMO