It's war time...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's funny that someone immediately assumes I'm taking sides because I acknowledged someone for attempting to break apart the monotony with a differing opinion...

I haven't even brought my views on this subject matter into this discussion, nor will I... Just went off on a tangent about some debating skills I see present right now.

I may just agree with you.

Then again I may not.

I'm not going to discuss it here - as it's beyond pointless.

That should bake your noodle...

 
Originally posted by jlaine It's funny that someone immediately assumes I'm taking sides because I acknowledged someone for attempting to break apart the monotony with a differing opinion...

 

I haven't even brought my views on this subject matter into this discussion, nor will I... Just went off on a tangent about some debating skills I see present right now.

 

I may just agree with you.

 

Then again I may not.

 

I'm not going to discuss it here - as it's beyond pointless.

 

That should bake your noodle...
LMAO //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

not baked at all, pleased //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Even if you disagree with me, you come across as someone I could respect even with differing opinons.. You aren't trying to debunk me as a person to prove your 'opinions' like most do.. and I appreciate that..

As to being 'behond pointless'.. that's relative. I do it to pass time as I have precious little else to do (sad, I know *sigh*).. keeps me from spending money at the bar and keeps me out of EQ..

Though, I must admit, you didn't make it seem like you were commenting on 'debating skills I see right now', you made it seem like you've read many posts from me and decided you didn't like my position .. perhaps you don't.. not that it's important.. and, as a point of note, by saying "Bravo LWW, well handled retort(s)" you implied he actaully did a decent job of debating, yet if you look closer, you see he actually did a pretty shitty job on all but 1 post.. just used misdirection and twisted things to make his stance look more valid.. ................................ K, I'll shut up now //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
I explicitly stated supporting the troops, yet there was a bit of confusion here.. something implied that I wasn't supporting them ..
i actually mis-spoke there....it was supposed to read..."this isn't directed at Savant"..my apologizes...been a long day

the cnn thing, i heard this morning before my long day....i guess when the shooting starts, almost anything goes. however, the rules of war thing can be debated forever and always..so i'll drop that

I missed putting it like this "lying TO and cheating Americans" .. meaning I don't support the people that lie to and cheat the American people..
this still applies to ALL politicans...except maybe Jesse Ventura...there is no such thing as a honest politican...they are all after the same thing..power...be it al bore(really like that lww) or gwb....hell, i voted for perot(spell?) and then some guy named larry brown( i think) who was going to leglaize pot and put a firearm in every home..but anyway...

i don't feel as though you owe me an apology for using my statements.....but i will say this....jlaine and lww have hit a few things....u have yet to really prove ur points or disprove others..u have rambled on repeatly, as have others....i think it is all a push..and maybe should be left alone...i am not taking anysides here, except what i said in my previous post..but there are young ppl here who may not or want not to understand what is going on, and to have a totally intellectual debate is both fruitless and frivilous(spell?)..it just ain't going to happen, not here..not ever.

and with that...i think i am too tired to continue...

 
Originally posted by Savant Wow.. were to start..

 

, there is no point in hoping you might be able to absorb and analyze someone elses thoughts (not saying you have to agree, just be able to understand.. )
Ya know I dont really appreciate you insulting me like this! I made mistakes in my wording, thank you for correcting me..But u had no right to insult my intelligence and or in making me look as though I am an "IDIOT" or a "MORON"..if u view me as this..well good for you! I'd rather be a **** moron than a ******* PRICK!! Glad to know u have no more to do than go through our posts and correct every mistake we have made, and insult all of us!! So all I am going to say to you is "GET A LIFE":mad: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif :p

Blake

 
Originally posted by mrray13 i actually mis-spoke there....it was supposed to read..."this isn't directed at Savant"..my apologizes...been a long day
Just as I was trying to point out.. yes, it's easy to do and, in my opinion, warrents clarification if someone tries to use it against you.. *shrug*

the cnn thing, i heard this morning before my long day....i guess when the shooting starts, almost anything goes. however, the rules of war thing can be debated forever and always..so i'll drop that
I have no idea.. I was under the impression that the rules of war were 'there'.. and were meant to be adheard to during war.. like can't torture POWs, etc.. but, yeah.. dropping is best I think..

this still applies to ALL politicans...
I agree totally!

except maybe Jesse Ventura...there is no such thing as a honest politican...they are all after the same thing..power...be it al bore(really like that lww) or gwb....hell, i voted for perot(spell?) and then some guy named larry brown( i think) who was going to leglaize pot and put a firearm in every home..but anyway... 

i don't feel as though you owe me an apology for using my statements.....but i will say this....jlaine and lww have hit a few things....u have yet to really prove ur points or disprove others..
And I would argue that most of what I have to say (on most of these points) can't be 'proved' as they are negative cases.. that is, someone says "Saddam has chem weapons".. that isn't something I can say I disagree with then 'prove'.. but, they can only prove their statement when either we A) find them, or B) he uses them.. does that make sense? There are people saying 'we have proof he had chem weaps' but can't support that statement.. that's different than me saying "I don't think he still has any"... I can't prove that without an extensive study and inspections of Iraq, which Bush cancled..

I understand what you are getting at, but in this thread, there is precious little that I could 'prove' reasonably, but there are many statements people are making that they really should be able to 'prove' if they make them (they shot scud missles.. no, we 'think they might' have, don't have the wreckage.. they used weapons of mass distruction.. um.. which ones?.. none reported so far.. they used chem weapons.. where? which ones? well.. um.. the alarms went off.. did they find chemicals in the air? um.. no.. but.. see what I mean?)

u have rambled on repeatly, as have others....i think it is all a push..and maybe should be left alone...i am not taking anysides here, except what i said in my previous post..but there are young ppl here who may not or want not to understand what is going on, and to have a totally intellectual debate is both fruitless and frivilous(spell?)..
Actually, I feel like a good intellectual debate is usefull in and of it's self, just for the sake of sharing knowledge and causing each other to think.. selfactualization... mmmmmm...

it just ain't going to happen, not here..not ever.
This may be.. unfortunately.. too true..

 
Originally posted by SoundsUnlimited Ya know I dont really appreciate you insulting me like this! I made mistakes in my wording, thank you for correcting me..But u had no right to insult my intelligence and or in making me look as though I am an "IDIOT" or a "MORON"..if u view me as this..well good for you! I'd rather be a **** moron than a ******* PRICK!! Glad to know u have no more to do than go through our posts and correct every mistake we have made, and insult all of us!! So all I am going to say to you is "GET A LIFE":mad: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif :p

 

Blake
LOL.. touche //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Sorry.. I was feeling a bit attacked at that point (and was, but not really by you).. sorry.. I do tend to let myself get carried away sometimes.. I assaulted denim as well for not putting any punctuation in his post and claimed to be a teacher.. but, he has (to me) a reasonable point that he teaches math and physics.. no need for punctuation //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

I was just overly frustrated cause you seemed to say the same things that others have said (support Bush.. saddam is nuts.. war sucks but that was the only choice.. we are there to free the Iraqis .. that's a real sore spot for me since I feel that if we really gave a shit, we would have liberated them in 92...).. anyway, I'm sorry.. I've had posts where I've made plenty of mistakes too, and to have those focused on as a means to diminish the points is not a respectable way to debate.. I appologize.. Though, karma stepped in.. I mis-spoke when talking to someone else about it and ended up accusing RangerMan of that post.. Then I had to appologize and modify other posts to straighten it out.. see what happens when you try to distract from the real points?? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

Again, I appologize.. you are correct, that was a very prickish thing for me to do..

(oh, and I don't have much more to do with my time //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif .. sad, isn't it? *sigh* //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif )

 
Originally posted by Savant LOL.. touche //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

 

 

Again, I appologize.. you are correct, that was a very prickish thing for me to do..

 

(oh, and I don't have much more to do with my time //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif .. sad, isn't it? *sigh* //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif )
Well I am enlightened to know that there are some people on these forumns with a good head on their shoulders;) ...I greatly appreciate the apology.

Blake //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Originally posted by SoundsUnlimited Well I am enlightened to know that there are some people on these forumns with a good head on their shoulders;) ...I greatly appreciate the apology.

 

Blake //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
Far be it from me to deny when I act like an *** //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Actually, there are NO confirmed reports that they are Scud missles..
True being that missiles explode. These were I am sure Savant actually the Iraqi Olympic team practicing the shot put. Or perhaps the Iraqi army flinging our arms back at us. GEEESH!!! Have some dignity.

Also, the 'burning' oil fields haven't been confirmed yet either, they are 'supposing' they are on fire from sattelite photos..
Again these are quite likely in reality Iraqi flares set up to show the Allies the way. AMAZING!!!.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

US sending 661,000 tons of foodstuffs to feed starving Iraqis.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Iraqi people welcoming Allied forces with open arms. Amazingly Savant is wrong again.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Allied KIA after 1 day = 1. To reach the minimum of Savant's prediction of 1,000's the war must last 5 years 174 days at this rate.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Allied invasion gaining ground with absolutely minimal loss of life and property on both sides.

Savant you proclaim yourself a GENIUS even though the majority seem to view you as....well not a genius. You always slip in one BS line hoping to exonerate yourself and then spout off a repeat of whatever nonsense farts out of Saddam's arse, or any other anti American thug.

Your obvious goal is to incite flame wars and like all bullies you can't stand it when someone stands up to you. You NEVER seem to have anything to back up your Bravo Sierra pontiffications yet demand proof, proof, and more proof from everyone else. When confronted with proof you whine and urinate and moan about how it really isn't proof. After all SADDAM SAID he had no scuds, or would not set the oil wells on fire (again). Hey we only see the fires on sattelite! That's not proof.

Well Savant I do have incontrovertible proof of one thing and that is that you are a pompous, arrogant, ignorant, fool. What is my proof? YOU! You prove the point with far more eloquence than I could ever deign to bring to this forum.

PEACE

 
Originally posted by LWW True being that missiles explode. These were I am sure Savant actually the Iraqi Olympic team practicing the shot put. Or perhaps the Iraqi army flinging our arms back at us. GEEESH!!! Have some dignity.
Actually, there are plenty of ways to confirm the type of missle even after it blows up.. you just have to care to look... and I'm pretty sure I thought I saw an article where they mentioned 2 missles didn't explode on impact.. Not to mention, different types of missles have different looks and behaviors while in the air, and Scud missles can be identified as such, if and when someone cares to actually look at them.. Just because you have a missle doesn't mean you are in violation of the Resolutions.. But, there is no explaining that to someone that would take a bottle rocket as proof that someone was in violation to further their personal crusade..

Again these are quite likely in reality Iraqi flares set up to show the Allies the way. AMAZING!!!.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

US sending 661,000 tons of foodstuffs to feed starving Iraqis.

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Iraqi people welcoming Allied forces with open arms. Amazingly Savant is wrong again.
No one EVER said the Iraqi people weren't being oppressed or that they wouldn't like to see the troops.. I said I'm not aware of any formal request for help. And I said that we did NOT go into this mess as a humanitarian action, if you are too thick to see that Bush has changed his reasons several times on NATIONAL TELEVSION, then I can't help you. First it was (IIRC) disarming, then it was linked to Sept. 11, then back to disarming and a touch of 'regeim change'.. now it's to free the Iraqi people? I guess you are right.. the link to Sept. 11 and liberating the Iraqi people is direct and clear //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Allied KIA after 1 day = 1. To reach the minimum of Savant's prediction of 1,000's the war must last 5 years 174 days at this rate.
Never mind the 12 British and 4 Marines that died in a hellicopter crash.. on friendly ground.. Just because only (and I have no knowledge of this, by the way) person was killed in 'combat' doesn't mean people aren't dying.. But, I guess if it's not by an Iraqi bullet it doesn't count to you..

!!!NEWSFLASH!!!

Allied invasion gaining ground with absolutely minimal loss of life and property on both sides.
And I'm sure that has nothing to do with the fact that they are rolling through desert that has been PUMMELED with munitions before they roll on it, and have choppers patrolling and keeping them where there are no people.. Though, I suppose, those goat farmers they went past might try to stop them.. ya never know ...

Savant you proclaim yourself a GENIUS even though the majority seem to view you as....well not a genius. You always slip in one BS line hoping to exonerate yourself and then spout off a repeat of whatever nonsense farts out of Saddam's arse, or any other anti American thug.
Where did I proclaim to be a genius? You apparently didn't read the other threads where you made the same accusation and I defined Savant for you.. It means learned person or scholar.. neither implies genius.. And why do you keep trying to imply I'm sypathetic to Saddam? Oh, wait.. I know.. to try and stirr up emotions in people reading the thread so you can better try to alienate them from my arguments and make it easier for you to spout gibberish and get a standing ovation.. You should run for office.. you'd make a great politician (oh, wait.. I just did what you did only I did it based on relative truths; You try to associate me to a sick psycho when there is no justification.. ok, nevermind, mine is a reasonable association while yours is just another example of how people lacking debating skills do their dammdest to distract from the points)..

Your obvious goal is to incite flame wars and like all bullies you can't stand it when someone stands up to you. You NEVER seem to have anything to back up your Bravo Sierra pontiffications yet demand proof, proof, and more proof from everyone else. When confronted with proof you whine and urinate and moan about how it really isn't proof. After all SADDAM SAID he had no scuds, or would not set the oil wells on fire (again). Hey we only see the fires on sattelite! That's not proof.
No, it wasn't proof, it was an implication.. NOW we have confirmation that there are well buring, NOW we have proof.. tragic.. horrific.. Did the US drop troops at the wells to try and avoid it? nope.. But that's not the issue either.. Now you are going to try and say that since he's burning the wells that he must have WOMD and chem./bio weapons.. I'm sure to you there is a causal correlation, to anyone that isn't trying to bend the truth to their needs it's obvious that one has nothing to do with the other.. We still have NO confirmation that he is currently in violation of the UN resolutions.. You asked for an admission of being wrong in a different thread, and I submit to you AGAIN.. as soon as you show any proof that he is in violation, I will happily concede that he was in violation.. All I'm saying NOW is, we don't know that he's in violation so the entire utterance forth of feces about being there to disarm is just that, crap.. Oh, wait.. we aren't there to disarm anymore, we're there to liberate the people.. oh.. wait.. or is it to change the government to a democracy? I can't keep em all straight..

Well Savant I do have incontrovertible proof of one thing and that is that you are a pompous, arrogant, ignorant, fool. What is my proof? YOU! You prove the point with far more eloquence than I could ever deign to bring to this forum.
Actually, you have really only provided ONE example of a true mistake on my part (the Canada oil supply point) that I directly recall, in all of your posts to all of your threads; Everything else you have ever mentioned has been total bullshit, quite frankly. You keep sidestepping valid points and only try to refute things in a light that makes you look 'smart', yet each time you do it I point out the flaw in your logic or statements.. If that makes me popmous, arrogant and ignorant, then so be it.. I can't help it that you can't debate in a civil or sensible manner..

 
Originally posted by ss3079 Sooo, uhhh...who watched Shock and Awe this morning?

 

- Steve
Watching it now thanks!

Gotta say one thing- there is definately no way to compete with something of this magnitude.

Simply too much to contend with at one time.

In my opinion- Iraq has allready fallen.

Very cool, yet also very sad in a way.

Certainly Very Interesting!!

You do the math.

take it easy,

-zane

 
Originally posted by zane Watching it now thanks!

 

Gotta say one thing- there is definately no way to compete with something of this magnitude.

 

Simply too much to contend with at one time.

 

In my opinion- Iraq has allready fallen.

 

Very cool, yet also very sad in a way.

 

Certainly Very Interesting!!

 

You do the math.

 

take it easy,

 

-zane
I'm with you. While it is very cool and interesting it is very sad to see. Any war is sad to see.

But, I guess it was neat to watch:confused:

- Steve:)

 
.. as soon as you show any proof that he is in violation, I will happily concede that he was in violation..
You who would view yourself as learned should read the UN resolutions and ceasefire agreement. Prompt admission of proof is then expected.

As to our President, their are multiple reasons for this war, this in no way ameliorates any other reason. DUH! I eat a steak because I'm hungry. OOPS...I eat steak because I like it so the I'm hungry argument is now invalid? AMAZING logic.

Your constant obfuscation is becoming tired and boring. Your bait and bytch approach is below the level of true debate. Your arguments are repetitive, disproven, unprovable, argumentative for the sake of argument, and intellectually bankrupt. The fact that someone calls you on this is what relly bugs you.

When you actually have a point which can be demonstrated please inform us. In the mean time I will watching the American bottle rockets on the tube.

"THOSE OF YOU WHO THINK YOU KNOW EVERYTHING AND ACTUALLY KNOW NOTHING ANNOY THOSE OF US WHO DO KNOW SOMETHING AND WANT TO LEARN EVERYTHING."

PEACE

 
Originally posted by LWW You who would view yourself as learned should read the UN resolutions and ceasefire agreement. Prompt admission of proof is then expected.
Huh?

As to our President, their are multiple reasons for this war, this in no way ameliorates any other reason. DUH! I eat a steak because I'm hungry. OOPS...I eat steak because I like it so the I'm hungry argument is now invalid? AMAZING logic.
Again you try to twist things, ineffectively if you ask me.. You are trying to compare 'eating' to killing innocent people.. And, your example doesn't cause conflict with other reason as stated.. Though, you don't "eat steak because you are hungry" .. you "eat because you are hungery".. you add to that "eat steak because I like it".. there is no conflict.. Your wording doesn't match the argument you are trying to convey..

Of course we can be there for 'multiple' reasons, but that would also imply someone has enough sense to mention them together.. If you say "I hate you because you stink".. then a shower is taken, then say "I hate you cause your hair is black", then a dye job insues, then say "I hate you cause you have a car", the other reasons for 'hating' have been elieviated so you can't be hating for all of them.. in a similar context.. if asked why you are doing somehing and you say "X" and people say, "but X isn't proven".. then you say, "um.. for Y then", and people say "but, Y isn't valid since it's being done", then you say "um.. Z".. you are CHANGING the reasons.. not going in for multiple reason.. you are trying your dammdest to make sure you get what you want no matter the excuse.. THAT is why I say we aren't there for humanitarian reasons.. that just happens to be the last one that people couldn't call him on.. but, again, the US is NOT in the habbit of giving a rat's *** about humanitarian causes in the name of WAR.. If you refute that, then show me one declaration of war based on "liberating" the populous (that the US faught for some other country).. and it can't be this one, as it would be the first..

Your constant obfuscation is becoming tired and boring. Your bait and bytch approach is below the level of true debate. Your arguments are repetitive, disproven, unprovable, argumentative for the sake of argument, and intellectually bankrupt. The fact that someone calls you on this is what relly bugs you.
Here we go again with the projecting.. We had this discussion in another thread way back when. Look up 'obfuscation'.. that's what YOU do.. as exemplified with the 'hungry/steak' analogy.. You try to confuse others to match your state of confusion then say I try to make things obscure? I don't "bait and bytch" either (not that I have any idea how you use a 'sales' tactic of bait and switch to try and apply here, but what ever).. I'm being accused of being repetitive by others here, which means I keep standing by my statements while others (like you) keep offering some pointless distraction instead of stepping up and answering the question or offering proof.. How many times in the "out of Curiosity" thread of yours have I asked for ONE link to support your statements of violation? MANY.. how many links have you supplied to support your accusation? NONE... But "I'm" the one obfuscating? You are flat out dodging issues.. You have yet to disprove any of my arguments (excepting the Canada oil one, which I actaully offered the proof to to show my own mistake).. Many of my points are not provable, true.. but you are making statments that are supposedly 'provable'.. yet you can't/don't offer proof to back it up.. I CAN'T offer proof for my statment since I'm saying we haven't found anything illegal yet, THAT IS NOT A PROVALBE STATMENT, ONLY DISPROVABLE, which hasn't been disproved yet.. Not even knowing the difference (as you apparently don't) is much more intellecutally bankrupt.. Intellect.. the ability to process information and use that information.. you obviously can't.. So, you call me bankrupt despite my understanding that my statements can't be proven since the inspectors have been removed.. You can prove your statement only when a violation has been found (and documented, you keep saying everyone knows about the violations, but yet offer no proof of that..)

I don't get bugged by being called on something when it's a valid call, I get bugged when people who fancy themselves intellectual yet are barely average in mind, try in vain to make me look as vacant as them. You keep using piss poor tactics, then accuse me of it.. you keep making statements that should be provable but offer no proof, then say I'm not proving my (unprovable) statements..

We, once again, come to the point where you can offer no substance to back up your supposedly 'provable' statements and refuse to even admit that you won't offer proof or can't.. so this debate might as well be over now.. You are a die hard patriot (in your own mind at least) who thinks the President and this country can do no wrong.. You are entitled to that. I truely feel sorry for you for being so blind and closeminded as to never question authority and feel the need to lash out at anyone strong enough to do so.. Instead of throwing a tantrum next time, perhaps you will provide a reasonable discussion of your views with supporting proof for your statements of fact.. Until then, I'm done responding to any of your posts since you manage to press my buttons and I diminish myself to your level of conversing and that bothers me more than anything else..

"THOSE OF YOU WHO THINK YOU KNOW EVERYTHING AND ACTUALLY KNOW NOTHING ANNOY THOSE OF US WHO DO KNOW SOMETHING AND WANT TO LEARN EVERYTHING."

PEACE
Well, since I know I don't know everything but strive to learn as much as I can.. I'll presume you aren't talking to me.. and, in that context, that's a decent statement (is that a quote? or something you came up with?).. Though, I have to immagine it doesn't apply to you since you seem to know you don't know everything but you obviously don't want to learn anything that might upset your tiny view of the world..

peace.. bah.. peace never changed the world, revolution causes advancement..

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

TheGrimReaperKD

10+ year member
Twiztid Mothaf*cka
Thread starter
TheGrimReaperKD
Joined
Location
Florida
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
737
Views
12,929
Last reply date
Last reply from
JimJ
IMG_20260513_214311575.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260513_213956814.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top