Originally posted by LWW Well Savant you insist upon showing your ignorance on issues and facts again.
Your first quote was in reply to you totally misrepresenting to someone else what my thinking was.
Hey, if they are as ignorant as you, then I guess I have to agree with you.. I said IT WAS MY THOUGHT that you meant something else.. Not that dakota's response was 'wrong' and mine was right or that anyone should presume you meant/thought what I was proposing.. Once again you display your unmistakeable lack of reading comprehension, or you are relying on that failing in people you are trying to have on your side.. which ever, you really should take some reading courses..
You assume you know all and the more I read the less it seems you do know.
Second you could list the Civil War, Grenada, Panama, Gulf War I and II among others.
Civil war was internal to the US.. sorry.. And it was sparked by liberals to free slaves that the conservatives had.. Hmm.. yeah, that's a good feather in the cap of conservatives fighing for civil rights of foreginers.. course, by the time all is said and done, the conservatives will have made tons of money off the sweat and blood of forgeiners who do the labor while the white guys sit around making money..
I'll do some reading up on Grenada and Panama..
As for the Gulf War, we did NOT declare war on Iraq 'first' and for no other apparent reason than to free the people from their leader, we were begged by Kuait to help them and offered a lot of oil as payment, if I recall correctly.. So the first Gulf war was NOT a US INITIATED humanitarian war. We, once again, jumped in an existing war (unless you don't count Kuait fighting off Saddam who was killing millions an existing war..)
Next[,] one of the most misrepresented items by liberals is that there is a legal seperation of church and state when there isn't. Read it and become learned. There will be no establishment of a state religion. Nothing precludes the President or anyone else from believing in a Higher Power or invoking their name. It amazes me how many people claim that by not being able to force their puke down someone elses throat that they being violated. Oh please stop it or bring out the violins one. It brings tears to my eyes.
I'll start reading up on the law/constitution then.. All I can go by is what I was taught/told/learned in public schools, college, and from the news and such .. There is a tiny (though I seriously doubt it) chance that you may be correct and the seperation as I understand it is something else.. I'll get back to you on that..
Although, while I agree the President (and any public servant for that matter) has the right to believe in what ever god they wish, they do NOT have a right to bring that belief into the public arena, as soon as they do that, they are endorsing their religion (which could be construde as attempting to establish their beliefs as a 'state' sanctioned set of beliefs).. So, after I find the exact wording, I'll revisit this point..
Of course the liberal mindset has always been that they understand better than the founding father what the constitution meant. Forget the fact that Thomas Jefferson would beotch slap most judges if he saw where his ideals had been taken.
You are such a dillhole man.. Are you honestly going to tell me that there has NEVER been ONE Conservative that has brought the meaning of a point of the constitution to question? That's something that happens almost anytime someone feels their rights are being trampled and EVERYONE looks into it..
Man, talk about someone that is looking to dump all blame of the worlds problems on one source, you keep pointing all ills to 'liberals'.. How sad that you think that the general idea of openmindedness and compassion is the cause of all the worlds ills..