****it, they just placed a phot enforced cameras at my nearest intersection

[tEh koRnDog 5,000+ posts]

if you let someone borrow your car and they run a red light and get caught on camera YOU deserve to have to pay for it. why? cuz youre DUMB enough to let someone who doesnt know how to drive drive your car. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif or you're dumb enough to trust another dumbass with your car so you deserve the ticket.

exactly

but wait for it, boomboomboy will tell you your missing the point, because he thinks he mr know it all

wait for it............wait for it.....

 

[duckfart 10+ year member]

THey have them here all over the place. I seen some ad selling some sort of license plate cover that suppose to reflect the flash from the cameras. Does anyone know if they work ?

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

THey have them here all over the place. I seen some ad selling some sort of license plate cover that suppose to reflect the flash from the cameras. Does anyone know if they work ?

i havent heard if they work or not, but i do know that you will get a ticket for it.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

Yeah, they're new to me. What a ****ing joke? What's next? Cameras in the changing rooms to make sure you don't shoplift? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

i'm considering it but there are more ugly chicks for every hot chick so it isn't worth it

 

[LeofromtheH 10+ year member]

where you been? under a rock? they've been in houston for a while now.

 

[BoomBoomBoy 10+ year member]

THey have them here all over the place. I seen some ad selling some sort of license plate cover that suppose to reflect the flash from the cameras. Does anyone know if they work ?

They work, but in most states they're illegal if you're caught

 

[Wonderbread 5,000+ posts]

I know that in Alberta, photo radars do not affect your license in any way, they simply cost money.

And that info regarding the increased frequency of rear-end accidents is misleading. Look at it this way - There are far fewer SERIOUS mid-intersection accidents.

The kinds of rear-enders that occur are because of stupid people following too close, not because of the leading driver. The potential for serious injury (ergo serious costs being imposed on the insurance companies, medical system, etc) is FAR greater for those mid-intersection collisions than it would be for a far less devastating rear-ender.

 

[the_noob 10+ year member]

The reflective covers are illegal in a lot of places but as far as I know the spray stuff is legal everywhere. And even if it isn't, how are they going to catch you? They are putting the cameras up in my town soon, so I will be ordering some as soon as they go into action.

http://www.photoblocker.com

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

Did you just get off the stupid bus? I should be able to loan my car to anyone I choose w/o the chance of being incorrectly ticketed. I don't loan my car out that much, but I guess the point flew right over your skull! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

actually, its called common sense dipshit, you are responsible for your car, if your dumb enough to loan it to people well thats your own fault

 

[BoomBoomBoy 10+ year member]

actually, its called common sense dipshit, you are responsible for your car, if your dumb enough to loan it to people well thats your own fault

Your response is just ignorant

 

[1loudsuv 10+ year member]

I know that in Alberta, photo radars do not affect your license in any way, they simply cost money.
And that info regarding the increased frequency of rear-end accidents is misleading. Look at it this way - There are far fewer SERIOUS mid-intersection accidents.

The kinds of rear-enders that occur are because of stupid people following too close, not because of the leading driver. The potential for serious injury (ergo serious costs being imposed on the insurance companies, medical system, etc) is FAR greater for those mid-intersection collisions than it would be for a far less devastating rear-ender.

this is true. from what ive heard on the news is the mid intersections accidents are down like 30% and rear enders up 50%..

they should keep them though but only to document accidents to see who was at fault in case of one

 

[myflow 10+ year member]

Your response is just ignorant

You e-roll your eyes far too much to be taken seriously.

Bottom line is you are responsible for your car. You, being the insurance holder of said vehicle, are responsible for any crime your car is linked to with exceptions of auto theft. If you let someone who is not listed on the car's insurance drive your vehicle, you are putting your vehicle and yourself at risk. It's a little thing some people call responsibility.

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

You should be more careful who you loan your things to. If you loan your vehicle out, you assume responsibility for the things that happen to it. I would think you'd be happy if you found out someone was being disrespectful to you and wreck-less with your property. Its a huge liability to you. Yes, there are ethical dilemmas but i think the overall outcome is very productive. If you disagree that passionately you should either find a more valid forum for your discussion (perhaps city hall) or just accept it.

 

[Railrocker 10+ year member]

As a driver you are responsible for everything your passenger does. Like throwing something out the window, not wearing a seatbelt, smoking crack. So why would you not be responsible for what a person borrowing your car does.