If shooting for SPL, should you maximize cone area for constant wattage?

I went from a AQ hdc3 12 to four 10's. the 10's have a jl w6 motor and basket and credence soft parts. all was run off a nine.1.

so 1200rms to the 12 and 300rms to each 10.

 
My advice would be to find efficient subs and build an efficient (as large as possible) box for them. In your case, 4 twelves that don't require a lot of power would probably be your best option.

 
where u getting these numbers from?
I mistakenly assumed he meant he went from a single 12" to four 10" subs.

A=pi*r^2

12*12*3.14=452.16

10*10*3.14*4=1256

Now if he's talking going from ONE 12" to FOUR 12" subs then yeah it's just a simple quadrupling of cone area in which case my original point is only more true. You switch from one sub to four at the same size and unless you went from like a XXX to four Bazookas your output is obviously going to be way higher.

 
If you have limited power, you have to look at both power usage and cone area. If you have 1800 watts at your disposal, four 12's aren't going to do you any good if each of them needs 800 watts, but a pair of 15s would do pretty well.

Literally everything you've said in this thread is incorrect. What do you mean the sub "needs" 800 watts? No sub "needs" any specific amount of power. The rms rating is not a reference on how much power to give the sub so that it reaches some magical land of potential. It is the thermal power handling limit of the voice coil.

The sub's efficiency through the frequency range you're going to be playing it at determines how loud it will be on what power. Of course the only efficiency calculation we have available to us is for the sub at frequencies WAY higher than we'll ever play through it and are basically useless to us... but if we had one that could tell us what the efficiency of the loudspeaker was at 1w@1m for 20hz, 45, and 80hz, we might be able to have a good idea which sub would be louder than another and how much power it needs to suit our needs. Any wattage below RMS is what a sub "needs". Geez, you dolts on this forum need to stop spreading your misinformation.

Also, your cone area calculations are WAY off. It takes work to be wrong EVERY time. You must be working hard at it.

 
I mistakenly assumed he meant he went from a single 12" to four 10" subs.
A=pi*r^2

12*12*3.14=452.16

 

10*10*3.14*4=1256

Now if he's talking going from ONE 12" to FOUR 12" subs then yeah it's just a simple quadrupling of cone area in which case my original point is only more true. You switch from one sub to four at the same size and unless you went from like a XXX to four Bazookas your output is obviously going to be way higher.
math is wrong 12is the diameter... 6 is radius of 12 in circle... also cones are usually not flat so surface area is off from that as well....

 
Literally everything you've said in this thread is incorrect. What do you mean the sub "needs" 800 watts? No sub "needs" any specific amount of power. The rms rating is not a reference on how much power to give the sub so that it reaches some magical land of potential. It is the thermal power handling limit of the voice coil.
Also, your cone area calculations are WAY off. It takes work to be wrong EVERY time. You must be working hard at it.
x2 on being wrong...

 
math is wrong 12is the diameter... 6 is radius of 12 in circle... also cones are usually not flat so surface area is off from that as well....
LOL, I'm having a slow day. I even wrote R for radius and STILL used the **** diameter. Forgive me on that. The proportions still maintain though.

 
math is wrong 12is the diameter... 6 is radius of 12 in circle... also cones are usually not flat so surface area is off from that as well....
your correct but the magic number is effective piston area, and we've actually done the math together the depth of the cone makes no difference in effective piston area at all (i know it looks like it should but theres a huge thread on here disproving the fact)

a decent estimate for such is

310cm^2 for 10's

480cm^2 for 12's

810cm^2 for 15's

and 18's vary from 1000-1200cm^2

so 4 10's would be 1240cm^2 which is 2.58x's a single 12

 
i went from a single 12 to four lower rms subs and they walk all over my single sub...

I did just the oppisite, went from 4 lower RMS 12s (350w each) to a single 15" (1000w RMS) and it walked all over the 12s on around the same power.

Now that I think about it, the 12s had more power. Im running a single 18" now and its way louder than the 15" was.

My vote is a nice large sub, depending on how much space is ava.

 
I had a AQ2200 running 2 15" L7s, now i am using the same amp pushing my 18" Solo X and it DOMINATES the L7s on the same power.

I did think about going from my 18" to 4 12"s... but i dont know.....probly not

 
I did just the oppisite, went from 4 lower RMS 12s (350w each) to a single 15" (1000w RMS) and it walked all over the 12s on around the same power.
Now that I think about it, the 12s had more power. Im running a single 18" now and its way louder than the 15" was.

My vote is a nice large sub, depending on how much space is ava.
what 12's to what 15?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

spencer321

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
spencer321
Joined
Location
palm bay
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33
Views
2,306
Last reply date
Last reply from
spencer321
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top