I'll have to play with the re website and look at what you guys
are talking about.
Edit:
It looks to me that using the OP's design, the port legnth the tool
exhibits is 24.75", the actual legnth is 23.75" and if you build the box
with 23.75 with 2.9cft of volume your tune would be deeper than
30.844; by my calculations anyway. It appears re is adding the displacement
of the wood used to make the port to the figure of 2.9 (ft3). When you calculate
2.77, which is the actual ft3 displacement, the port measurments are
correct (or very close). The 24.75 measurement they use for port length
is one I cannot explain, they are just adding an inch that I cannot account for.
Basically, I'm saying the ft3 they are using is off by the displacement of the
port wood. Whatever, I'll use winISD to design the box and that RE tool looks
great to determine the cutouts for the MDF.
Just my opinion, there is a lot more brainiacs on here way better than me.
I could be way wrong.
are talking about.
Edit:
It looks to me that using the OP's design, the port legnth the tool
exhibits is 24.75", the actual legnth is 23.75" and if you build the box
with 23.75 with 2.9cft of volume your tune would be deeper than
30.844; by my calculations anyway. It appears re is adding the displacement
of the wood used to make the port to the figure of 2.9 (ft3). When you calculate
2.77, which is the actual ft3 displacement, the port measurments are
correct (or very close). The 24.75 measurement they use for port length
is one I cannot explain, they are just adding an inch that I cannot account for.
Basically, I'm saying the ft3 they are using is off by the displacement of the
port wood. Whatever, I'll use winISD to design the box and that RE tool looks
great to determine the cutouts for the MDF.
Just my opinion, there is a lot more brainiacs on here way better than me.
I could be way wrong.





