Lugnutz
10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
My parents told me the exact same thing.I'm done. I'm not even going to try. You win. We are all just an accident.
My parents told me the exact same thing.I'm done. I'm not even going to try. You win. We are all just an accident.
I'm not sure I understand this comment.Ok...I still don't see any documentation of HUMAN remains from millions of years ago.
Evolution still doesn't explain how the planet even formed, or the galaxy etc. I still haven't seen definitive proof that human evolved from fish or monkeys.Im just tired of people saying science and religion dont contradict each other. They do 100%. Its either one or the other.
One has no proof or backing, other than a book written 2,000 years ago that is filled with a ton of facts that are either obviously wrong or can be scientifically proven to be wrong.
The other has been tested, can be quantified, and follows the framework of the scientific method and doing experiments with things that we know as fact as controls.
I know plenty about natural selection. I was actually going to be a bio major and was very interested in this type of stuff. I just find to many holes (not found by me, just ones that are pointed out) that doesn't support Natural Selection, or any type of evolution.Natural Selection does not say that we are an accident.
Goes to show how much you understand about it.
homosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?I'm not sure I understand this comment.
What species of man are you referring to?
want me to copy it in word and tell you it was my thesis paper for my senior writing class? This shit is not my own, i'm not intelligent enough to try and go prove evolution wrong. I'm also just trying to save myself time. If you really want the credibility check his bibliography...First of all, you have no credibility if the only thing you can do is link me to other people's articles, because it only confirms to me that you have no idea what you're talking about.
That link is full of crap, just like the video.want me to copy it in word and tell you it was my thesis paper for my senior writing class? This shit is not my own, i'm not intelligent enough to try and go prove evolution wrong. I'm also just trying to save myself time. If you really want the credibility check his bibliography...
So you think Neanderthals were here "a few hundred years ago"? Seriously? Neanderthals are a VERY recent ancestor to **** sapiens sapiens(the closest, I believe), but they still died out around 15,000 years ago IIRC...there are MANY older ancestors that we have found dating back to a couple million years ago. I still can't believe that you think we haven't found any fossils older than a few hundred years...do you think these people just make this stuff up with no proof whatsoever?homosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?
the oldest modern human find is around 200,000 years old, and neanderthals have probably been extinct for at least 20,000 yearshomosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?