Hey you evolutionists...

Im just tired of people saying science and religion dont contradict each other. They do 100%. Its either one or the other.

One has no proof or backing, other than a book written 2,000 years ago that is filled with a ton of facts that are either obviously wrong or can be scientifically proven to be wrong.

The other has been tested, can be quantified, and follows the framework of the scientific method and doing experiments with things that we know as fact as controls.

 
Im just tired of people saying science and religion dont contradict each other. They do 100%. Its either one or the other.
One has no proof or backing, other than a book written 2,000 years ago that is filled with a ton of facts that are either obviously wrong or can be scientifically proven to be wrong.

The other has been tested, can be quantified, and follows the framework of the scientific method and doing experiments with things that we know as fact as controls.
Evolution still doesn't explain how the planet even formed, or the galaxy etc. I still haven't seen definitive proof that human evolved from fish or monkeys.

 
Natural Selection does not say that we are an accident.
Goes to show how much you understand about it.
I know plenty about natural selection. I was actually going to be a bio major and was very interested in this type of stuff. I just find to many holes (not found by me, just ones that are pointed out) that doesn't support Natural Selection, or any type of evolution.

http://www.evanwiggs.com/articles/reasons.html

that guy has a lot of good stuff as well

 
First of all, you have no credibility if the only thing you can do is link me to other people's articles, because it only confirms to me that you have no idea what you're talking about.

 
I'm not sure I understand this comment.
What species of man are you referring to?
homosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?

 
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Missing-Link-Scientists-In-New-York-Unveil-Fossil-Of-Lemur-Monkey-Hailed-As-Mans-Earliest-Ancestor/Article/200905315284582

47 million years ago - They found a lemur which they believe to be the modern humans first ancestor.

We arent an accident. We are something that just happened. The conditions happened just right, and here we are.

Is it really that hard to believe that in a space 93 BILLLION light years across with trillions of trillions of trillions or stars and planets that life would happen? Play the odds game.

 
First of all, you have no credibility if the only thing you can do is link me to other people's articles, because it only confirms to me that you have no idea what you're talking about.
want me to copy it in word and tell you it was my thesis paper for my senior writing class? This shit is not my own, i'm not intelligent enough to try and go prove evolution wrong. I'm also just trying to save myself time. If you really want the credibility check his bibliography...

 
want me to copy it in word and tell you it was my thesis paper for my senior writing class? This shit is not my own, i'm not intelligent enough to try and go prove evolution wrong. I'm also just trying to save myself time. If you really want the credibility check his bibliography...
That link is full of crap, just like the video.

My favorite line from the video was along the lines of: If evolution were true, there would be bones and fossils from the organisms from the beginning of life.

There is. Video de-bunked. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 
homosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?
So you think Neanderthals were here "a few hundred years ago"? Seriously? Neanderthals are a VERY recent ancestor to **** sapiens sapiens(the closest, I believe), but they still died out around 15,000 years ago IIRC...there are MANY older ancestors that we have found dating back to a couple million years ago. I still can't believe that you think we haven't found any fossils older than a few hundred years...do you think these people just make this stuff up with no proof whatsoever?

Google is your friend: http://rationalrevolution.net/images/Fig_04.gif

I also grasp from your last sentence that you think all dinosaur fossils are fake, since they're supposedly older than a few hundred years. Do you deny the proof of dinosaurs being millions of years old?

 
homosapiens. I am honestly not aware that we have found remains like bone or tissue of something other than homosapiens and "neanderthals". I mean we find bones that are left from a few hundred years ago, at that deterioration rate, how could we find thigns from millions of years ago?
the oldest modern human find is around 200,000 years old, and neanderthals have probably been extinct for at least 20,000 years

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,147811,00.html

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

idunnowhat

10+ year member
Best member evah!
Thread starter
idunnowhat
Joined
Location
Hawaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
738
Views
13,523
Last reply date
Last reply from
FoxPro5
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top