ok first off, let me apologize for not providing videos or updates yesterday. murphy's law seems to like me, and it always seems to happen when i make promises. ok now to the subject at hand, the hdc3.
after putting the sub in to its new home, i have found 3 things (1 of which happened this morning).
1) the mechanical nosie does not occur nearly as bad as it did before. plus, i can turn it up much more before i hear any of it. also after that last thread i made, where i said i could not hear the noise from the front seat, i listened to a song that really made the sub move, and guess what? i heard it from the front seat. however, so far, after the little bit of use the sub has had, plus the new enclousure, i have yet to hear it from the front and its also a lot, and i mean a lot quieter in when im up close and personal with the sub. this to me suggests, that the noise is going away with breakin (as spl140.2 and dbdesignselite have both told me about the HD (spl140.2) and the HDC3 (dbdesignselite)).
2) the sub really doesn't have a problem hitting the lows with a 38hz tuning (check out the video with "hold that thought", that is a 32hz note. no 32hz isnt incredibly low, but its pretty much as low as most music will go anyways). i was pleasantly surprised since, i was debating over and over and over and over and... ( im sure you get it by now), if i really wanted to tune that high. i cant help but to got off my previous experiences and not want to do it, but i did it anyways to the advice of DJ and others. it could use a little bit more punch (maybe after break in? i know FS is suppose to drop from 38, down to about 30hz) on the lower end compared to the btl, but if you are scared that tuning so high will guarantee no bottom end, think again. its actually pretty close to the btl in bottom end, even with the higher tuning.
the biggest thing i did notice though is, in the same enclosure as the btl (not this one), the hdc only sacrificed a teeny bit on the low end, but had a very nice gain in upper end. something that the btl didnt seem to do well in my application. it could of been the enclousure (a smaller box maybe?) but in the previous 4.5@33 they were both in, the hdc315, in my application at least, out performed the btl (even when the hdc3 was giving me the mechanical noise issue, it still performed beautifully)
3) i like the way this sub sounds better than my btl. also seems a good bit more efficient. but remember, i dont have the btl to test in the same enclosure anymore, so please dont base this off "oh 1 guy said the hdc3 is better than the btl, so its the truth". the btl might of very well improved in this enclosure as well. i will say this though, running the sub free air, the btl had A LOT more mechanical noise associated with it. i have not gotten a chance to test the AQ on more SQ orientated tracks (where im looking for separation and detail etc). only thing i have listened to using the new enclosure has been rap, some reggae, and some Jefferson Airplane lol. i will say this though, as my final thought, in MY APPLICATION, hdc315 > btl15. now on to the pics/vids
i love the caulk //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif. also, no that is not my house. that is the gf's neighbors, whose dad is one LAZY ****er, who will not clean up a **** thing.
sexy sexy sexy, looking sub
ugly ugly ugly, looking box