I always hear that, but where do I borrow various guns to try them out? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifTake her to a target shooting class...see what she feels comfortable with.
To collect more govt. income through fines and what not?So what is the purpose of the police?
Shooting an AK is fun. I shot one at a target range and was impressed with the power. It's strange...when you are shooting something capable of such power, there is a rush of sorts. Why an individual would need one, I do not know. I don't see a personal issue with it though. But I do think they should be able for rent at shooting ranges, it is fun stuff.Either way, this is straying from my original argument. If you need a gun to feel protected (as opposed to any other weapon), then fine. Own a gun. Why would you own several? Further, why do you even need a gun that will kill someone? If protection is your only concern, then you only need something capable of incapacitating them. No AK's required.....
Try moving North a bit. Of all the people I know closely in my city, only 5 have guns. 3 are police officers and the other two hunt. No one collects guns. Heck, in a lot of areas you don't even need to lock your doors.Because of the information age, there really isn't a way. If the information I got on crime was limited to my local paper or something, I probably wouldn't have this fear.
They let you. There is a place locally called "On Target"...for $20/hr, you can shoot whatever gun you'd like...but you have to buy ammo/targets. They also sell guns.I always hear that, but where do I borrow various guns to try them out? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Other methods are inefficient...What do you want us to use? Pepper spray? Taser? Knife? All aren't even close to 100% efficient at stopping someone...Also i would rather have a larger caliber round in case that the person i'm shooting at is wearing a vest...thats just me though....Either way, this is straying from my original argument. If you need a gun to feel protected (as opposed to any other weapon), then fine. Own a gun. Why would you own several? Further, why do you even need a gun that will kill someone? If protection is your only concern, then you only need something capable of incapacitating them. No AK's required.....
Well now you're brushing close to my point. People don't keep them for logical reasons...they keep and collect them because they enjoy the power they get from those possessions. It feels good to know you have something you could use to inflict significant damage (I've shot a gun and I know the feeling). I don't believe most gun advocates actually keep their guns for protection, as most have never encountered a situation that necessitate such concern.Shooting an AK is fun. I shot one at a target range and was impressed with the power. It's strange...when you are shooting something capable of such power, there is a rush of sorts. Why an individual would need one, I do not know. I don't see a personal issue with it though. But I do think they should be able for rent at shooting ranges, it is fun stuff.
Is it wrong to collect for that reason? Or do you wish that people would just say..."I like to shoot guns because it makes me feel powerful"?Well now you're brushing close to my point. People don't keep them for logical reasons...they keep and collect them because they enjoy the power they get from those possessions. It feels good to know you have something you could use to inflict significant damage (I've shot a gun and I know the feeling). I don't believe most gun advocates actually keep their guns for protection, as most have never encountered a situation that necessitate such concern.
Why?Well yes, I do wish people would be truthful. I think a rational mind can easily discriminate the difference in value between collecting baseball cards for fun, and collecting guns to have the power they provide. Feeling good because you have the power to destroy is not necessarily a feeling we should be seeking out, or endorsing.
"Better to have and need, then need and not have"Well now you're brushing close to my point. People don't keep them for logical reasons...they keep and collect them because they enjoy the power they get from those possessions. It feels good to know you have something you could use to inflict significant damage (I've shot a gun and I know the feeling). I don't believe most gun advocates actually keep their guns for protection, as most have never encountered a situation that necessitate such concern.
There is a big difference between your "power" argument and home defense.Well yes, I do wish people would be truthful. I think a rational mind can easily discriminate the difference in value between collecting baseball cards for fun, and collecting guns to have the power they provide. Feeling good because you have the power to destroy is not necessarily a feeling we should be seeking out, or endorsing.
A gun is a tool, Do you own a crescent wrench and nothing else? "The right tool for the right job."Either way, this is straying from my original argument. If you need a gun to feel protected (as opposed to any other weapon), then fine. Own a gun. Why would you own several? Further, why do you even need a gun that will kill someone? If protection is your only concern, then you only need something capable of incapacitating them. No AK's required.....