You are incorrect. And if you have a DMM that can read into the .001 ohm range, then you are doing well, and should know that you are wrong, as you can afford such a sensitive piece of equipment..Originally posted by chris229 do which ever --- you can measure the voltage difference. You guys are right about saying -- is the little bit of resistance worth while to eliminate. I'm just saying there is LESS resistance this way thats ALL.
you will only have 1 more connection point on a chassis connection. your right does the connection in this last connect equal more than the given resistance of connecting to the battey directly through this depends on length of battery direct connect wireOriginally posted by jlaine
You are incorrect. And if you have a DMM that can read into the .001 ohm range, then you are doing well, and should know that you are wrong, as you can afford such a sensitive piece of equipment..
There will be more resistance going through the chassis at the two connection points than there will be with a direct connect. You have eliminated two non-uniform connections by directly connecting to the battery.
You will have two more connection points, not one.Originally posted by chris229 you will only have 1 more connection point on a chassis connection. your right does the connection in this last connect equal more than the given resistance of connecting to the battey directly through this depends on length of battery direct connect wire
you got me on that-- don't know what it was thinkingOriginally posted by jlaine
You will have two more connection points, not one.
Battery to cable, cable to chassis, chassis to cable, cable to amp.
voltage drop with a known current is a good test. After thinking about it. I think you guys got me on that one.Two junction points on the chassis, as apposed to none with the alternate..
The length of wire is short because the battery is in the trunk, and I know you don't have a machine that can measure it's resistance accurately...