Not necessarily. Not in all cases. You're just plain wrong. If you went from 2 18's in your suv to say 20 18's you're not going to gain. More IS NOT always louder. It's not just factual. What I've stated so far is absolutely true. if you're arguing it you've never broken a 150.Well did you not state "More cone area does not = more spl"? Given all other system components are equal, with just a change in size of woofer......you will gain..... it is simple physics.
i have to agree with a good design good power and a well sealed vehicle multi sub systems always get loud.Anybody else remember the days when all the top SPL scores were a dozen or more woofers? Alma Gates with 64 12's? I've seen enough of that style build to believe that if you stick enough best buy woofers in a van it'll get loud. After a point it becomes much more complicated, but I believe mid to high 50's is possible with almost anything in sufficient quantity.
what show were you at????? 6 18 SMD's and 3 DC9k's supposedly wired to .35ohm each, also had 4 DC alts. Serious set up for sure.I was just at a local car audio show. Frost off in Madison, WI.
A guy showed up from IOWA. He had 6 18" SMDs. He did a 159. He had 3 DC 9ks.
He used to have a MTX Jackhammer 22. And did a 156.1
Is it that hard to gain decibels?
Why are you going to such extremes with your examples? Makes your arguement less valid IMO.Not necessarily. Not in all cases. You're just plain wrong. If you went from 2 18's in your suv to say 20 18's you're not going to gain. More IS NOT always louder. It's not just factual. What I've stated so far is absolutely true. if you're arguing it you've never broken a 150.
yesi was just at a local car audio show. Frost off in madison, wi.
A guy showed up from iowa. He had 6 18" smds. He did a 159. He had 3 dc 9ks.
He used to have a mtx jackhammer 22. And did a 156.1
is it that hard to gain decibels?
No and No. How can you miss the point of my examples? These guys have said that adding cone area and power is what is required to create spl and threw out enclosure design altogether. So I have used absurdity to demonstrate their absurd opinions. I even keep saying "by your logic if some is good then more is better right?". So how could you miss the point? I suppose we should talk about your lack of comprehension, or your self proclaimed credibility. I've broken 150 a few times too. Before just now had I said that? Was it necessary to try to boost my e-peen? Nah. It wasn't. I'm just trying to straighten out a few misguided people in here. I'm obviously correct so I'm not really sure why you or anyone else who says they know what they are talking about would want to argue.Why are you going to such extremes with your examples? Makes your arguement less valid IMO.
So are you saying that doubling cone area, assuming you have room to build a proper enclosure won't be louder 99% of the time?
I've broken a 50 once or twice...
How's the weather up there?I'm obviously correct so I'm not really sure why you or anyone else who says they know what they are talking about would want to argue.
Really? People want to take shots because I know I'm right about something?... especially something as known as just adding a bunch of woofers is not going to help with SPL. You act like people should just bumble through life never sure of anything.How's the weather up there?
neither of those guys could design a box if their life depended it. There are guys doing 155's in the 30hz region with 2 15's... If you can't do high 150's with 6 18's your an idiot.
By saying neither of those guys could design a box, I would think that implies adding more woofers is based on knowing how to build a proper enclosure. I wouldn't say he threw out the idea of enclosure design.No and No. How can you miss the point of my examples? These guys have said that adding cone area and power is what is required to create spl and threw out enclosure design altogether. So I have used absurdity to demonstrate their absurd opinions. I even keep saying "by your logic if some is good then more is better right?". So how could you miss the point? I suppose we should talk about your lack of comprehension, or your self proclaimed credibility. I've broken 150 a few times too. Before just now had I said that? Was it necessary to try to boost my e-peen? Nah. It wasn't. I'm just trying to straighten out a few misguided people in here. I'm obviously correct so I'm not really sure why you or anyone else who says they know what they are talking about would want to argue.