FYI. (mainly for Sic Audio)

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

and i could of swore that they proved einstien e=mc2 to be right not wrong

 

[Mike465 10+ year member]

hahahahahhahahahha u made me spill my beer

Party foul.........//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

Party foul.........//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

I know I know, dont know why but when i read that post i laughed so **** hard, kicked the coffee table and over my beer went. quick rescue tho not much was lost and theres plenty left //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

 

[hornedfrog1985 5,000+ posts]

They proved it by seeing stars behind the sun that aren't actually there. Their light is bent around the sun by gravity. That is when they proved it. The guy was probably high when he was watching the discovery channel.

 

[hornedfrog1985 5,000+ posts]

I think he has brain damage

 

[grimreper912003 5,000+ posts]

keep this up top

 

[dragnix 5,000+ posts]

and i could of swore that they proved einstien e=mc2 to be right not wrong

last I heard it's wrong because the speed of light is not constant

 

[SicAudio 5,000+ posts]

go read up on Stephen Hawking there are several write-ups and white papers from MIT ect he wasnt entirely wrong but he wasnt entirely right either //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

as his original formula it is inaccurate meaning it is not 100% which is why it was a theory not a fact . you may need to learn to use a dictionary ......

 

[SicAudio 5,000+ posts]

last I heard it's wrong because the speed of light is not constant

exactly this is how SH proved the "theory" was not 100%

some people are too stupid to understand tho i guess.....

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

I think Einstein must be wrong to some degree, possibly to a large degree. Scientists for 70 years have been trying to make Einstein's theories compatible with quantum physics and failed ..... For large planatary objects Einstein appears correct, at quantum level his theories are fairly useless.

Einstein's E=mc^2 formula being correct doesn't automatically means all his other 'thought experiments' or gravity assumptions are actually right. Some think it is possible to modify Newtons laws slightly and keep E=mc^2 still true.

Nor does Einstein's prediction of effects like a 'cosmological constant' hold true. This predicts at rate at which the universe is expanding - it's simply wrong. So many theories have been adapted to make Einstein still correct, such as thoeries on black holes, etc.

Even Einstein towards the end of his life began to have doubts.

".. there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all."

Albert Einstein age 70

Before Einstein, scientists believed in 'aether' theories, a background medium through which light travelled, I'm not saying these are true either but these type of ideas were dismissed too quickly (rather than modified to fit) alternative aether like thoeries could still exist and not contradict e=mc^2

 

[hornedfrog1985 5,000+ posts]

You know hawkings is just using a theory to disprove einstein right?

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

and stephen hawking is amazing

 

[galacticmonkey 5,000+ posts]

If you looked at Stephen Hawking you would think hes a fucking retarded cripple.

But hes actually pretty gangster. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[SicAudio 5,000+ posts]

You know hawkings is just using a theory to disprove einstein right?

yes i do know that

thats the point noob they are theories not facts a theory is an educated guess based on knowns and guessing at the rest based on assumption or tests to get an answer. pick up a dictionary for god sake.

and SH is not the only 1 that has done it //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

google Carl Sagan ..........

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

You know hawkings is just using a theory to disprove einstein right?

science is constantly proving and disproving previous theories and ideas, thats what its all about. i didnt know einstein personally so its not gonna hurt my feelings //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif