Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
FYI. (mainly for Sic Audio)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slo_Ride" data-source="post: 6607201" data-attributes="member: 563830"><p>I think Einstein must be wrong to some degree, possibly to a large degree. Scientists for 70 years have been trying to make Einstein's theories compatible with quantum physics and failed ..... For large planatary objects Einstein appears correct, at quantum level his theories are fairly useless.</p><p></p><p>Einstein's E=mc^2 formula being correct doesn't automatically means all his other 'thought experiments' or gravity assumptions are actually right. Some think it is possible to modify Newtons laws slightly and keep E=mc^2 still true.</p><p></p><p>Nor does Einstein's prediction of effects like a 'cosmological constant' hold true. This predicts at rate at which the universe is expanding - it's simply wrong. So many theories have been adapted to make Einstein still correct, such as thoeries on black holes, etc.</p><p></p><p>Even Einstein towards the end of his life began to have doubts.</p><p></p><p>".. there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all."</p><p></p><p>Albert Einstein age 70</p><p></p><p>Before Einstein, scientists believed in 'aether' theories, a background medium through which light travelled, I'm not saying these are true either but these type of ideas were dismissed too quickly (rather than modified to fit) alternative aether like thoeries could still exist and not contradict e=mc^2</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slo_Ride, post: 6607201, member: 563830"] I think Einstein must be wrong to some degree, possibly to a large degree. Scientists for 70 years have been trying to make Einstein's theories compatible with quantum physics and failed ..... For large planatary objects Einstein appears correct, at quantum level his theories are fairly useless. Einstein's E=mc^2 formula being correct doesn't automatically means all his other 'thought experiments' or gravity assumptions are actually right. Some think it is possible to modify Newtons laws slightly and keep E=mc^2 still true. Nor does Einstein's prediction of effects like a 'cosmological constant' hold true. This predicts at rate at which the universe is expanding - it's simply wrong. So many theories have been adapted to make Einstein still correct, such as thoeries on black holes, etc. Even Einstein towards the end of his life began to have doubts. ".. there is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm. I am not sure if I was on the right track after all." Albert Einstein age 70 Before Einstein, scientists believed in 'aether' theories, a background medium through which light travelled, I'm not saying these are true either but these type of ideas were dismissed too quickly (rather than modified to fit) alternative aether like thoeries could still exist and not contradict e=mc^2 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
FYI. (mainly for Sic Audio)
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list