Jmac
10+ year member
Retired
There were tons of things that didn't work w/ XP when it came out ... SimCity, for example ... Easy Media Creator 4, for example ... Epson Stylus Colour, for example ... Ultima VIII, for example ...yup... all my hardware that worked on 2000 worked on xp (as did the software), and I wasn't running XP I was running whistler.Like I said if your trying to compare the issues with 2000 or xp to vista, I would say you should do one of two things, 1) play with different computers a little more to get a feel for what different configurations run like, 2) put the crack pipe down.
I have installed xp on quite a few systems, each system worked like a charm, programs from the maritime world all the way to very old realestate programs, from old thumbdrives to old (and I mean OLD) printers, to new scanners, even slide scanners... gps units... I cant even remember them all.
I played with vista (both as vista and longhorn) and had immediate issues even in multiple configurations (something I never experienced (at any level) with xp or whistler).
you may call this anecdotal but I believe this is the general consciouses for people who know and build/fix/see different computers.
Ever try getting a wide variety of shit to work w/ Linux ? OS X ? Vista has immensely superior hardware and software support, but no one slags them over it ...
I build/fix/see computers w/ Vista and XP everyday ... Vista isn't any worse than XP is except in hardware/software support and performance on low-end hardware, but that's only because XP is almost 6.5 years old and EVERYTHING released in the last 6 years was designed around XP ...
XP was sluggish on low-end hardware when it first came out ... XP didn't have as good of hardware/software support as Windows 98 when it first came out ... FACT OF LIFE WHEN A NEW OS IS INTRODUCED ...
