fi btl 18" vs re audio xxx 18"

[05trailblazer 10+ year member]

LOTS OF IDEAS OUT HERE...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/search.gif.e79a63b2b580b39b282dff402646b704.gif

 

[MONSONwarrior Premium Member]

How much bull **** can you spew from one mouth?

Please explain to me how the RE XXX is a HT sub? The XXX was designed to be an efficent sub that sounded great. Although it can get loud the sub was not designed to be a SPL sub.

The BTL on the other hand was designed to be an SPL sub that can soak up power and put up good numbers. It just happens that the BTL can sound alright -not SQ - but alright.

And before you reply to me please think you response through. If you attempt to tell me the BTL is SQ orientated in any way it will show a huge amount of ignorance from you. The BTL is simply a SPL sub that can sound decent to the average user. Put an SQ competitor in a car with a BTL and watch them rip it apart.

do you understand the new levels of the BTL's? the N3 is supposed to be just SPL, the N2 is supposed to be a daily SPL woofer, and the N1, from the way I understand it is supposed to be the most SQ oriented of the group.

 

[mast240 10+ year member]

The new re style, they look massive

not as good as the old style re's... the new ones arent as well made

 

[kramer_212 10+ year member]

which btl there are 2, and a new one in the works

 

---------- Post added at 02:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:04 PM ----------

 

3 not 2

 

[grimreper912003 5,000+ posts]

do you understand the new levels of the BTL's? the N3 is supposed to be just SPL, the N2 is supposed to be a daily SPL woofer, and the N1, from the way I understand it is supposed to be the most SQ oriented of the group.

Do you understand what true SQ is?

The BTL is exactly what I said it is. A SPL sub that can sound alright. I dont care what a company tells you. They may sound better then the old BTL and the N3 sound but it is not a "sq" sub.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

How much bull **** can you spew from one mouth?

Please explain to me how the RE XXX is a HT sub? The XXX was designed to be an efficent sub that sounded great. Although it can get loud the sub was not designed to be a SPL sub.

The BTL on the other hand was designed to be an SPL sub that can soak up power and put up good numbers. It just happens that the BTL can sound alright -not SQ - but alright.

And before you reply to me please think you response through. If you attempt to tell me the BTL is SQ orientated in any way it will show a huge amount of ignorance from you. The BTL is simply a SPL sub that can sound decent to the average user. Put an SQ competitor in a car with a BTL and watch them rip it apart.

Simply put, my reference to the XXX being a HT sub came from someone with much better knowledge than me. The way he said it made sense to me, and I believed him.

The N1 is a more SQ oriented woofer, and I pointed that out. I would say it's similar to the Q. I never said the BTL was a strictly SQ sub and that's its only purpose. The N2, N3 are more SPL geared compared to the N1, so that's all I was saying. The N1 isn't made with the same mind state of the previous BTL's.

You need to chill homie //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Do you understand what true SQ is?
The BTL is exactly what I said it is. A SPL sub that can sound alright. I dont care what a company tells you. They may sound better then the old BTL and the N3 sound but it is not a "sq" sub.

Nobody said it was an oober SQ sub! I said it was SQ oriented woofer broslice.

 

[grimreper912003 5,000+ posts]

Simply put, my reference to the XXX being a HT sub came from someone with much better knowledge than me. The way he said it made sense to me, and I believed him.
The N1 is a more SQ oriented woofer, and I pointed that out. I would say it's similar to the Q. I never said the BTL was a strictly SQ sub and that's its only purpose. The N2, N3 are more SPL geared compared to the N1, so that's all I was saying. The N1 isn't made with the same mind state of the previous BTL's.

You need to chill homie //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

Im chill.

I must have misunderstood what you wrote then. To me it came off like you were saying the N1 was designed to be an SQ sub.

 

[sacsking916 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/boobiez.gif.bcca53c4e1c9539300cad4d7d1b9dd4d.gif

 

[Dirtrider4eva 10+ year member]

alright so..

BTL:

n3, good SPL, bad SQ

n2, fairly good SPL meh SQ

n1, decent SPL, decent SQ

XXX old:

fairly good spl, good SQ

new XXX:

decent SPL, good SQ

am i right or what?..

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I would agree with that.

 

[sacsking916 5,000+ posts]

alright so..BTL:

n3, good SPL, bad SQ

n2, fairly good SPL meh SQ

n1, decent SPL, decent SQ

XXX old:

fairly good spl, good SQ

new XXX:

decent SPL, good SQ

am i right or what?..

no, new xxx isnt that great as far as SQ goes as far as i would say. but my opinion dont mean shit usually //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Im chill.
I must have misunderstood what you wrote then. To me it came off like you were saying the N1 was designed to be an SQ sub.

No, it's kind of like the Fi Q to me. It's Fi's sound quality sub, which means it's a fairly good sounding woofer that can still get loud.

 

[05trailblazer 10+ year member]

so far id say the fi btl would be a better choice. but as far as i knw one sub will sound good but not like having to of them.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/imo.gif.3a57bcc70a4835dc53e86ffae1a0b041.gif never like only to bumb one sub sounds weak.

 

[05trailblazer 10+ year member]

whats the cheapest you'll find one of those??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/typing.gif.fd7c44a94b6ea7a328969e3ae0e010f7.gif

No, it's kind of like the Fi Q to me. It's Fi's sound quality sub, which means it's a fairly good sounding woofer that can still get loud.