Evil-ution

Yes but it also "proved" the world was flat not to long ago. I don't trust any man on this earth to be 100% correct. Until I find a 6000+ year old living in some cave that was here at conception.
Again, what's the point? Are you saying that just because people have been wrong you are going to doubt every thing everyone tells you? Like I said knowledge * faith = wisdom. There is a measure at which things are safe to assume that you have to accept. You will never get the proof you look for. Meanwhile I'll be saving lives and enjoying my 7 figure salary by operating on the premise of these beliefs.

The Bible doesn't say the Earth isn't older than 6000 years.
I didn't say it did, I said I'm arguing against people who believe that based on the bible. Why have I had to repeat that 3 times?

 
Technically speaking why doesn't it matter? If everyone was obsessed with science and discovery disease and illness could very well have been eliminated and the earth would be a much much better place. People create these artificial constructs of reality in their mind to make it easier for them to not pursue research to find the truth. It's just laziness. We all know gas guzzlers are bad, but most of us don't go buy electric cars. We all know smoking kills, but lots of people still do it. If I can get one person interested in the truth, it was worth it.
This entire statement is based on your belief that you are unquestionably right. That is the same as Bible beaters. Neither side can prove what they say. We DO know that gas guzzlers aren't hurting anything. We know global warming is phony science as proved by the hacked emails of the climate research center in east anglia. We know it was created for political reasons. We know electric cars get their energy from the power grid which operates on fossil fuels and there are several efficiency losses when power is converted. So none of the things you said here are actually smarter.

 

---------- Post added at 05:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:02 PM ----------

 

I'll take your lack of evidence as an admittance of defeat, thank you for playing ecrack.
Sure bro... You sure defeated me.... lol and they are calling ME crazy. HAHAHA
 
You're the one that brought the previous threads up. You can't reference previous threads and then say you don't care about them. LOL!!
Incorrect. I said you get called out on nearly everything. You took that to mean that I was specifically talking about some other thread, when in reality I meant in this thread. Nice try though.

Does nobody being on someone's side instantly make them wrong?
No, but I thought you always had people agreeing with you? Nice try again.

is someone afraid to be on their own? Someone has to ride the bandwagon and fit in?
I've been on the "ecrack is kinda crazy and illogical" bandwagon for a while...may have even started it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

AWWW. I'm not afraid of being attacked by you. You're always fun.
Never said you should be, and I'm not even attacking you. Once again, your insecurity is showing.

 
Again, what's the point? Are you saying that just because people have been wrong you are going to doubt every thing everyone tells you? Like I said knowledge * faith = wisdom. There is a measure at which things are safe to assume that you have to accept. You will never get the proof you look for. Meanwhile I'll be saving lives and enjoying my 7 figure salary by operating on the premise of these beliefs.
You really can't handle some one not agreeing with you lol. Sure am going to doubt or at least not follow blindly behind some one who post ''proof'' on a, at current times, unprovable scenario. I believe theory is a synonym for ''educated guess'' In my realm of understanding a guess is not a positive unarguable fact. Just like I don't believe you make 7 figures unless you count the 2 after the decimal point.

 
Here's a few interesting snippits from a publication:

What about the length of the creative days? Were they literally 24 hours long? Some claim that because Moses—the writer of Genesis—later referred to the day that followed the six creative days as a model for the weekly Sabbath, each of the creative days must be literally 24 hours long. (Exodus 20:11) Does the wording of Genesis support this conclusion?

No, it does not. The fact is that the Hebrew word translated “day” can mean various lengths of time, not just a 24-hour period. For example, when summarizing God’s creative work, Moses refers to all six creative days as one day. (Genesis 2:4) In addition, on the first creative day, “God began calling the light Day, but the darkness he called Night.” (Genesis 1:5) Here, only a portion of a 24-hour period is defined by the term “day.” Certainly, there is no basis in Scripture for arbitrarily stating that each creative day was 24 hours long.

How long, then, were the creative days? The wording of Genesis chapters*1 and 2 indicates that considerable lengths of time were involved.

Moses wrote his account in Hebrew, and he wrote it from the perspective of a person standing on the surface of the earth. These two facts, combined with the knowledge that the universe existed before the beginning of the creative periods, or “days,” help to defuse much of the controversy surrounding the creation account. How so?

A careful consideration of the Genesis account reveals that events starting during one “day” continued into one or more of the following days. For example, before the first creative “day” started, light from the already existing sun was somehow prevented from reaching the earth’s surface, possibly by thick clouds. (Job 38:9) During the first “day,” this barrier began to clear, allowing diffused light to penetrate the atmosphere.

On the second “day,” the atmosphere evidently continued to clear, creating a space between the thick clouds above and the ocean below. On the fourth “day,” the atmosphere had gradually cleared to such an extent that the sun and the moon were made to appear “in the expanse of the heavens.” (Genesis 1:14-16) In other words, from the perspective of a person on earth, the sun and moon began to be discernible. These events happened gradually.

The Genesis account also relates that as the atmosphere continued to clear, flying creatures—including insects and membrane-winged creatures—started to appear on the fifth “day.” However, the Bible indicates that during the sixth “day,” God was still in the process of “forming from the ground every wild beast of the field and every flying creature of the heavens.”—Genesis 2:19.

Clearly, the Bible’s language makes room for the possibility of some major events during each “day,” or creative period, to have occurred gradually rather than instantly, perhaps some of them even lasting into the following creative “days.”

 
In summation of the last 14 pages

Beating_a_dead_horse.jpg


 
Incorrect. I said you get called out on nearly everything. You took that to mean that I was specifically talking about some other thread, when in reality I meant in this thread. Nice try though.
This thread was a call out. I replied to inject some logic...and I did that. Of course people were going to flame me. It's their religion we're talking about.
No, but I thought you always had people agreeing with you? Nice try again.
Lolwut?
I've been on the "ecrack is kinda crazy and illogical" bandwagon for a while...may have even started it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
I'm all about logic, but it's cool man. Whatever you want to say.
Never said you should be, and I'm not even attacking you. Once again, your insecurity is showing.
Opposite. I was showing my security. You made a comment. I responded welcoming you to do it. No insecurity there bro.
 
In the description of what happened on the first “day,” the Hebrew word used for light is ʼohr, light in a general sense; but concerning the fourth “day,” the word used is ma‧ʼohr′, which refers to the source of light.

"Contrary to the claims of some Fundamentalists, Genesis does not teach that the universe, including the earth and all living things on it, was created in a short period of time in the relatively recent past. Rather, the description in Genesis of the creation of the universe and the appearance of life on earth harmonizes with many recent scientific discoveries."

 
Also, I don't think you answered audioholic's question asking what you meant by the name ahole-ic, since according to you it was not an insult.

I'd like to see you try to squirm out of that one. But we all know you'll avoid it.

 
"Lol in every thread you've been in, there have been people agreeing with me."

Where are the people agreeing with you here?
You didn't see the past tense in the statement?

 

---------- Post added at 05:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:21 PM ----------

 

Also, I don't think you answered audioholic's question asking what you meant by the name ahole-ic, since according to you it was not an insult.
I'd like to see you try to squirm out of that one. But we all know you'll avoid it.
I explained it already. No squirming necessary. Your fire stoker must be damaged. You are not good at this.

 
I agree with some points, others I don't.
I'm referring to the specific points being argued, like science relying on as much faith as religion, evolution having NO proof to back it up, all the BS lying and playing stupid with the audioholic stuff, and others that are probably too worthless to remember. The dude's a joke, and he doesn't even see it.

 
The Genesis account opens with the simple, powerful statement: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) Bible scholars agree that this verse describes an action separate from the creative days recounted from verse*3 onward. The implication is profound. According to the Bible’s opening statement, the universe, including our planet Earth, was in existence for an indefinite time before the creative days began.

Geologists estimate that the earth is approximately 4*billion years old, and astronomers calculate that the universe may be as much as 15*billion years old. Do these findings—or their potential future refinements—contradict Genesis 1:1? No. The Bible does not specify the actual age of “the heavens and the earth.” Science does not disprove the Biblical text.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

cotjones

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
cotjones
Joined
Location
Wilmington, NC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
517
Views
6,642
Last reply date
Last reply from
MANTI5
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top