Evil-ution

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

I'm willing to bet that less than 1% of the readers see it ecrack's way. He gets called out on nearly every single thing, and once called out, pretends it never happened and goes back to the same tired, worthless, incorrect argument...over and over again. What's even funnier is that I honestly think that he's 100% serious on his ascertain of being in the right.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Nevermind, Im going to be nice. Im also going to bed. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Later all.

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

He'd get more support if he wasn't such a raving lunatic.

His attitude certainy doesn't help, but his arguing points are so random and off-base that I don't think it would matter.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

His attitude certainy doesn't help, but his arguing points are so random and off-base that I don't think it would matter.

Dang, and I was trying to be nice by changing my reply. lol! Oh well, I guess the world now knows I think ecrack is pretty much nuts.

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

Glad to see I'm not the only one that thinks that dude is nuts...

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

You believe in evolution others do not, both have reasons. That's as far as you're going to get here, dude. Expecting more is an exercise in frustration.

Arguing evolution is a hobby of mine. Granted most people's minds can't be swayed, but I enjoy seeing how people react when they have a belief contradicted by unequivocally dis-confirming evidence.

Such as the fact that if the earth were created 6000 years ago there would be no visible stars farther than 6000 light years away.

An extremely solid argument that biased non-believers have come up with some bizarre arguments to try to counter. One guy tried to tell me that the speed of light is a hoax created by secular scientists to try to discredit God's existence. These bizarre responses are what I look forward to. Think of it as taking the public's stupidity temperature.

 

[MANTI5 10+ year member]

But your arguments are against what many BELIEVE the Bible says, not what it ACTUALLY says. Therein is what will take an argument all over the place and just get silly on both sides. When a person STARTS from the middle ground and reviews evidence without the end result already firmly established in their mind they begin to be taken in directions far different than when they set out to prove or disprove a belief.

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

Arguing evolution is a hobby of mine. Granted most people's minds can't be swayed, but I enjoy seeing how people react when they have a belief contradicted by unequivocally dis-confirming evidence.
Such as the fact that if the earth were created 6000 years ago there would be no visible stars farther than 6000 light years away.

An extremely solid argument that biased non-believers have come up with some bizarre arguments to try to counter. One guy tried to tell me that the speed of light is a hoax created by secular scientists to try to discredit God's existence. These bizarre responses are what I look forward to. Think of it as taking the public's stupidity temperature.

technically all that would have to be around post 6000 years ago would be the space the earth inhabits. Not the earth itself.

 

[ahole-ic]

Ive reread that thread. The only other real insult I found (other than the usual troll comments) was someone called you an idiot. If I had seen that the firsdt time around, yes I would have deleted it. if you would have brought it to my attention then, yes I would have deleted it. But you didnt bring it to my attention, you simply continued to call me names. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see where that would lead you, considering I warned YOU specicially to stop BEFORE I ever handed out an infraction. I also expressed my regret, after your ban, that it came to that. But nothing satisfies you short of us all bowing down to your logic, your definitions of what should and shouldnt be allowed, and your double standards. And frankly, for someone who keeps claiming Im the butthurt one here, why is it we are STILL discussing something that pised YOU off a YEAR AGO? lol!

It didn't pis me off. I showed how you have a pattern of behavior. The reason we are still discussing it is because you are trying to spin it so you nobody sees you for what you are. You think if you can turn all the attention to me, nobody will notice what you have done. Don't let the people in here attacking me with you fool you. They always do that. There are far more people who see you for what you are than you know.

I havent made any sites successful. Of course, I havent made any failures like yours either. My point wasnt the amount of fail in your forum (that was just a fun little side benefit, since I can do that, here in the t-dome), it was that you are free to go there and exert any rules you want. Here, the rules are made by Goob, and enforced by myself and the other mods here. if you dont like it, you can discuss my actions with another mod here, or go home to your own site. But we both know you wont go there, because there is nobody there to garner your attention. lol!

If you had any idea what you were talking about, you'd know how stupid you sound. You have no measuring stick to know whether my site is fail or not. That, like evolution is your opinion. You are free to express it, but you fail to realize on both that your opinion means squat because you are nobody.

This is the crux of your problem. If someone disagrees with you, as I did in the fatmat thread, you are being 'attacked'. But if you change someone's name to call them an ahole, its not an attack on your part, its you just telling the truth. This is the same logic a 5th grader uses, "I can say it because its true". Well the truth is you are a petty, self-absorbed, hypocrite that cant see logic past his own nose.

There were several in this thread and others who disagree with me. It's only when they begin to attack me that I do this. You did, but like everything else you will say you didn't. That's ok... like everything else, it's in your character.

Ciao.

yeah

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

But your arguments are against what many BELIEVE the Bible says, not what it ACTUALLY says. Therein is what will take an argument all over the place and just get silly on both sides. When a person STARTS from the middle ground and reviews evidence without the end result already firmly established in their mind they begin to be taken in directions far different than when they set out to prove or disprove a belief.

PRECISELY. That's why its fun and thats why people say stupid things. That and alot of them are just stupid people in general. Most of the most prominent Charismatic Faith Healers have been quoted saying that their audiences for the most part are the severely uneducated or simple minded.

 

[ahole-ic]

His attitude certainy doesn't help, but his arguing points are so random and off-base that I don't think it would matter.

Really? Which ones?

 

---------- Post added at 04:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 PM ----------

 

Glad to see I'm not the only one that thinks that dude is nuts...

Here come more trolls. You and manti are like the same guy.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

technically all that would have to be around post 6000 years ago would be the space the earth inhabits. Not the earth itself.

Yeah, but the creation of stars are included in the creation account and thus many people argue against that notion.

IE:

14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

The Bible CLEARLY says that earth was created before the stars.

Of course I believe this entire account to be symbolic and just a transcription of handed down oral traditions. I'm arguing against the people that believe it's literal.

 

[ahole-ic]

I'm willing to bet that less than 1% of the readers see it ecrack's way. He gets called out on nearly every single thing, and once called out, pretends it never happened and goes back to the same tired, worthless, incorrect argument...over and over again. What's even funnier is that I honestly think that he's 100% serious on his ascertain of being in the right.

Please show where this has happened. Lol in every thread you've been in, there have been people agreeing with me. I think your bias has you mistaken. I schooled you on Iraq where you could not respond and now you're mad. I get it, but why come in and take cheap shots? It's not making you look better bro.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

Really? Which ones? 

---------- Post added at 04:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:43 PM ----------

 

Here come more trolls. You and manti are like the same guy.

Now everyone that thinks your nuts is a troll? Boy you just proved evolution cause by that logic half of the members of the human population would be trolls.

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

I also believe it also says in the bible that God's days are much longer then our years. I'm not going to start quoting the bible, it is far to easy to take what it says and create arguments based around it. I could call you a child molester and make parallels to the bible. It's one of the oldest tricks in the book, the bible will prove or disprove anything you want it to including itself.