Yes, so long as they give the masses a deal, lets ignore how they have lied, cheated and stole their way to get where they are now, right? ED has a long standing reputation for stealing when they can, lying about it when they cant. If you abide by this type of business plan, by all means, keep supporting them and being their salesman.
Troof. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
Yes, virtually all car audio companies are guilty of trying to steal patented technology directly off a competitors product, all the while touting how their new product will best the victim's product, like the JL W7 scandal, right? Virtually every car audio company has out and out lied about products, with every intention of misleading their customers into purchasing an inferior product for inflated prices, such as the eDead scandal, right? Virtually every car audio company out there has screwed large anounts of customers on faulty coned subs that broke if a gentle breeze touched them, right? And never refunded, or even returned the broken speakers back to the poor bastard customers who bought them, right? And yeah, almost every car audio company out there is guilty of trying to steal an entire speaker design from an OEM manufacturer they were using, like the Tang Band thing, right?
im sorry, but i owned a nine.1 and it was a badass amp. idk wtf youre talkin about.
I saw this one coming. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
I doubt you could tell whether or not the amp was less efficient than an average class d amp. I've never heard of the "less efficient" claims about the nine.1, but if it's true, it's not something you'd be likely to notice anyways.
Not to mention, its an admittance of guilt. Its the same old motive, so long as the individual isn't getting screwed personally, he can come up with any number of excuses for just about anything.
