Do NOT buy SKAR Audio

when i look at a lightning audio strike amplifier.... why does the word " strike" look like " skar " if i sqwint me eyelids real tight.?... lmao

sk.jpg


 
Here is a Rpost from SSA from one of the lead tech guys over there.. Here is what he had to say about the "pro audio" from them.
"The PAX-6.5, for example.

Re of 4ohms? I've never seen a speaker with an Re of 4ohms....nominal impedance, yes. But not Re. I'm going to presume it's 4ohm nominal and it's Re is somewhere in the 3.X range?

Second, a Qes of 1.758 and a Qts of .412 ? Even with nothing but a rudimentary understanding of T/S we can tell those numbers don't match up. Qes is the main determinant of Qts....those two numbers should be much closer. Qts should be more in the vicinity of 1.4

You list No as .19% and SPL 89.8db. Based on the listed Fs, Qes and Vas the No calculates out to be 1.28% and SPL 93db. A No of .19% would equate to a sensitivity of 84.8db, not 89.8db. So, in short, none of those numbers match up.

Your units for compliance are wrong, or your decimal is in the wrong spot. I'm assuming it's really .090742 mm/N

Based on the listed Vas and Cms, the Sd would be around 446cm^2, which is not much smaller than a 12" driver and obviously not correct.

Based on Mms and Cms, Fs should be 126hz, not 97hz.

That's not an all encompassing list, but a brief summary. In short.....those parameters are physically impossible and make no sense together whatsoever. "

Has this been covered? Skar making up specs.........Again?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

West

Banned
Thread starter
West
Joined
Location
Oliver Springs, TN
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
2,110
Views
55,545
Last reply date
Last reply from
nono
IMG_1882.jpeg

slater

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20251004_120904_Photo Translator.jpg

1aespinoza

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top