Debating on my enclosure again

just stick to what DJ says, no need to deviate from the creators.
I would disagree. Not be argumentative. A larger box with this power is going to be louder than the 1.5 cubic feet "ideal" box. I would make the box to specs, but I am lacking power at this moment in time. Also, imo it would allow me to hit the lows better.

 
go for 2ft^3

couldnt hurt but you have to experiment good sir //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
go for 2ft^3
couldnt hurt but you have to experiment good sir //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
not many people tend to go on any adventures these days....

I was actually thinking 2 cubic feet myself. Or maybe 2.25.

 
I would disagree. Not be argumentative. A larger box with this power is going to be louder than the 1.5 cubic feet "ideal" box. I would make the box to specs, but I am lacking power at this moment in time. Also, imo it would allow me to hit the lows better.
Why are you even asking if you already know its going to be louder?

 
There's a point to where you are going to lose output if you go too big. Yeah the efficiency will be good, but you're approaching the "free air" territory.
My name is Ben Hemp, I put quotation marks around free air cuz I'm hella awesome.

ZINGGGGG!!!!!!!

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Buck

5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
Thread starter
Buck
Joined
Location
Inside of a pyramid
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
11
Views
654
Last reply date
Last reply from
Lakota
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top