Current events discussion

Trump was found guilty of ****** abuse by the jury, but he wasn't convicted of raping someone. I haven't seen evidence either one actually occurred. She seemed nuts and the trial seemed to all be he said she said BS. But I don't really care as my whole personality doesn't revolve around what trump does and doesn't do. I prefer my AI repetitiveness over your orange man obsession. You could criticize him for more important things even but you don't. Mostly it's left wing psycho-babble. Barf
If this country has shown us anything it is that if a BILLIONAIRE can be sued for something, they will be. If she was truly sexually assaulted by Trump he would have been sued when it happened. This is America and b i t c h e s be greedy.
 
Last edited:
How about the immigrant's deaths under Obama?

I remember that Rachel Maddow dude did a big expose' on the poor medical care & kids in cages. MSDNC is always very critical of the Dems.
 
Trump was found guilty of ****** abuse by the jury, but he wasn't convicted of raping someone. I haven't seen evidence either one actually occurred. She seemed nuts and the trial seemed to all be he said she said BS. But I don't really care as my whole personality doesn't revolve around what trump does and doesn't do. I prefer my AI repetitiveness over your orange man obsession. You could criticize him for more important things even but you don't. Mostly it's left wing psycho-babble. Barf
He wasn't even found guilty, he was found liable. I do find it interesting that she couldn't provide a date, therefore Trump couldn't provide an alibi.
 
1769101371914.png


So when an armed person kicks in a door without a warrant, anyone inside has the right to respond with deadly force.
I don't think any declaration of "immunity" is going to bring someone back to life, if they get killed in a situation like that.
 
He wasn't even found guilty, he was found liable. I do find it interesting that she couldn't provide a date, therefore Trump couldn't provide an alibi.
So the argument is not that he would never do such a thing to a woman, it's that he didn't do it on a specific day?
Good defense.

Is this the same Trump that said he would not r*pe her b/c she is not "his type", then during his deposition identified a photo of her as one of his ex-wives?
Yeah it is. He identifies E Jean Caroll as Marla. He was confused because the photo is "very blurry".
1769101872478.png

 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,770
Views
453,023
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
20260423_214720.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
20260419_124349.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top