Old_Slapper
CarAudio.com VIP
It's funny how all these dems keep saying Trump is a crook while they are all raking in millions.Obama-era Russian Uranium One deal. Bill raked $500k speaking fee in Russia
It's funny how all these dems keep saying Trump is a crook while they are all raking in millions.Obama-era Russian Uranium One deal. Bill raked $500k speaking fee in Russia
No, you're really paying more for gas because the US seized a Venezuelan oil tanker.Exactly!
All he kept showing is how turkeys went up a few cents. What about everything else?
By the way, I just paid $3.55 per gallon of gas. I haven't paid that low in over 3 years.
Geez mister IDK what I was thinking.. Of course none of these libtards would do that. Right?
Nope, never did.So, now you're saying he was convicted as a ******? Why can't you make up your mind.
You sound like all those uneducated redneck Republicans who have no idea that gender is a social construct.You remind me of those whacked out dems who say gender is not determined by physical appearances, but yet, they have to change their appearance to feel more like a certain gender.
PBS.. Disgusting criminals.. They put a child predator ****** on a kids educational program, Targeted
for children ages 3-8 years old...
THIS IS WHERE ROBS GETS HIS NEWS??
Pretty clear?Well, if you actually read the entire context, you will see that Bill Clinton proved Trump was right about what he said.
I already quoted it, but to help you out, it was your post, # 26,681. Pretty clear you said the courts convicted him as a ******.
Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times.Again, I'm waiting for proof that he's a racist.
More repetition, no proof.For starters, you said he was a convicted ****** and a racist. You also stated Trump said Epstein is his best friend. You also said mono amps with dual outputs does not have those outputs internally bridged. Shall I continue, or are you going to show me proof that these are facts?
It's a good thing this guy is ignoring me.Pretty clear?
Tell us all where in the post you see it.
Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly.
Here's the post:
View attachment 69586
Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times.
More repetition, no proof.
The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth.
I said two wires touching are not "bridged".
I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power.
I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs.
I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn't make multiple outputs from those mono wires.
I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp.
Shall I continue?
If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me.
It only serves to make you look dumber.